Literature DB >> 25487952

Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities.

Pedro Berjano1, Max Aebi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The narrow correlation between sagittal alignment parameters and clinical outcomes has been widely established, demonstrating that improper sagittal alignment is a clinical condition that is associated with increased pain and limitations in patients' functional ability. INDICATION: Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is indicated in the treatment of large sagittal (more than 25° of rigid loss of lordosis) deformities of the lumbar spine or its combination with coronal deformity, especially when they are rigid. Indication should be based on careful assessment of the severity of symptoms, functional impairment, functional expectations of the patient, general clinical condition and surgical and anesthesiological team experience. Risk should be carefully assessed and discussed to obtain appropriate informed consent. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Surgical planning includes selection of the safest levels for the upper and lower instrumented vertebra, site of the osteotomy, modality of fixation, and, most importantly angular value of the correction goal (target lumbar lordosis). Failure to adequately obtain the necessary amount of sagittal correction is the most frequent cause of failure and reoperation.
CONCLUSION: PSO is a valuable surgical procedure in correction of severe hypolordosis (=relative kyphosis) in the lumbar spine. It is a demanding procedure for the surgeon, the anesthesiologist and the intensive care team. Although its complication rate is high, it has a substantial positive impact in the quality of life of patients, including the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25487952     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3670-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in flat back syndrome 38 years after Harrington instrumentation for AIS.

Authors:  Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods.

Authors:  P Berjano; R Cecchinato; M Damilano; C Morselli; V Sansone; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Ashish Patel; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano; Mary Petruzzi; Aldo Sinigaglia; Giovanni Casero; Riccardo Cecchinato; Marco Damilano; Roberto Bassani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Shaleen Vira; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine.

Authors:  Nicolas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Predicting outcome and complications in the surgical treatment of adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen Glassman; Michael R Shainline
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort.

Authors:  Jamie Terran; Frank Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Pierre Devos; Christopher P Ames; Kai-Ming G Fu; Douglas Burton; Richard Hostin; Eric Klineberg; Munish Gupta; Vedat Deviren; Gregory Mundis; Robert Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Jianning Shao; Bryan S Lee; Dominic Pelle; Maxwell Y Lee; Jason Savage; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.876

2.  Minimally invasive two-column correction of T10-L5 three-dimensional spinal deformity.

Authors:  William D Smith; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar degenerative kyphosis.

Authors:  Tae Sik Goh; Jong Ki Shin; Myung Soo Youn; Hong Seok Lee; Taek Hoon Kim; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study.

Authors:  Andrea Luca; Claudia Ottardi; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Tomaso Villa; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Thoracolumbar osteotomies.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Klaus J Schnake; Maryem Ismael; Patrick Tropiano; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  ALIF in the correction of spinal sagittal misalignment. A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  M Formica; E Quarto; A Zanirato; L Mosconi; M Lontaro-Baracchini; M Alessio-Mazzola; L Felli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences.

Authors:  Andrea Zanirato; Marco Damilano; Matteo Formica; Andrea Piazzolla; Alessio Lovi; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Giant-cell tumor of the rib cage extending to the spine : Case report.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Blanco; Marcelo Jiménez; Diego Rendón; David Pescador; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Diego Garbossa; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.