Literature DB >> 24057120

Site of impaction of ureteric calculi requiring surgical intervention.

Ehab El-Barky1, Yusuf Ali, Mohammed Sahsah, Ali A Terra, Elijah O Kehinde.   

Abstract

Textbooks describe three narrowest anatomic sites in the ureter as the most likely places for ureteral calculi to lodge, these are: the pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ), the point where the ureters cross over the iliac vessels and the ureterovesical junction (UVJ). The purpose of this study is to determine whether calculi causing ureteric obstruction and requiring surgical treatment are found mostly at these three narrowest anatomic points of the ureter. Three hundred consecutive patients with impacted ureteric calculi who required surgical intervention were studied. The location of the impacted calculus on the day of surgical intervention was categorized according to nine predetermined levels outlined in a designed diagram based on findings on non-contrast CT of kidneys, ureters and bladder. Two peaks in stone distribution in the ureters were encountered; the first was above the ischial spine in the proximal part of the lower third ureter (84 patients, 28%), while the second was at the level between L3 and L4 lumbar vertebrae (66 patients, 22%). Overall, the location of impacted calculi was as follows, 53, 34, 10 and 3% in the lower third ureter, upper third ureter, PUJ and mid ureter, respectively. This study demonstrates two peaks of calculi distribution in the ureter where ureteric calculi become impacted: the upper ureter below the PUJ and a second in the lower ureter, more proximal than the UVJ. There was an absence of the peak in stone location over the iliac vessels, that is, the mid ureter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24057120     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0605-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  10 in total

1.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Contemporary management of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Markus J Bader; Brian Eisner; Francesco Porpiglia; Glen M Preminger; Hans-Goran Tiselius
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Dean G Assimos; Peter Alken; Colin Buck; Michele Gallucci; Thomas Knoll; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret Sue Pearle; Kemal Sarica; Christian Türk; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Enis Tanovic; Zeljko Kikic; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Outcomes of ureteroscopy for the management of impacted ureteral calculi with different localizations.

Authors:  Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Zafer Kozacioglu; Murat Arslan; Cengiz Kara; Omer Koras; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment.

Authors:  J R Fielding; S G Silverman; S Samuel; K H Zou; K R Loughlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Stones lodge at three sites of anatomic narrowing in the ureter: clinical fact or fiction?

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Trevor D Schuler; Daniela Ghiculete; Kenneth T Pace; R John D'A Honey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success.

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; Jorg R Oddens; Tycho M T W Lock
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Adam Reese; Sonali Sheth; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients.

Authors:  Tomás Ripollés; Marcos Agramunt; José Errando; María Jesús Martínez; Belén Coronel; María Morales
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Image-guided study of swine anatomy as a tool for urologic surgery research and training.

Authors:  Jacob Hindrik Antunes Smit; Eduardo Piotto Leonardi; Rosa Helena de Figueiredo Chaves; Ismari Perini Furlaneto; Cezar Massoud Salame da Silva; Simone de Campos Vieira Abib; Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes Junior
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.388

2.  Mirabegron attenuates porcine ureteral contractility via α1-adrenoceptor antagonism.

Authors:  Iris Lim; Russ Chess-Williams
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.195

3.  Distribution of ureteral stones and factors affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Young Joon Moon; Hong-Wook Kim; Jin Bum Kim; Hyung Joon Kim; Young-Seop Chang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-10-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.