Literature DB >> 22743266

Outcomes of ureteroscopy for the management of impacted ureteral calculi with different localizations.

Tansu Degirmenci1, Bulent Gunlusoy, Zafer Kozacioglu, Murat Arslan, Cengiz Kara, Omer Koras, Suleyman Minareci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lithotripsy for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones with different localizations.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, between January 2010 and October 2011, 105 patients underwent Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones with different localizations. Ninety patients (85.7%) had single ureteral stone and 15 (14.3%) had multiple stones. Single stone mean and multiple stone burden were 11.9 ± 4.6 mm and 23.8 ± 8.5 mm, respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were grouped according to the modified Clavien grading system.
RESULTS: Success rates with regard to stone localization after single endoscopic session for single stones were 95.7%, 88.8%, and 81.8% for lower, middle, and upper ureter, respectively. The stone clearance rate was reclassified as lower (below the iliac crest) and upper, the stone clearance rate was highest in the lower ureteral stones (55 of 57 patients, 96.5% vs 27 of 33 patients, 81.8%; P = .047). Operation time and the success rate were the only statistically significant parameters effecting the complications (P = .001 and P = .012). According to the Clavien classification system, the overall complication rate was 27.5% in our study. The distribution of 44 complications in 27 patients; grade I, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IVa was 17 (16.2%), 6 (5.7%), 7 (6.7%), 13 (12.4%), and 1 (0.9%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Complications are more common in patients with longer operation time and unsuccessful intervention. Ureterorenoscopy (URS) using Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy can be an effective and safely performed technique in impacted stones with different localizations and considered as the first-line approach at single setting.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743266     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  Simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy and early endoscopic ureteric realignment for iatrogenic ureteropelvic junction avulsion during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Marawan El Tayeb; Matthew J Mellon; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The comparison of laparoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for large proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  M D Ufuk Ozturk; Nevzat Can Sener; H N Goksel Goktug; Adnan Gucuk; Ismail Nalbant; M Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Site of impaction of ureteric calculi requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ehab El-Barky; Yusuf Ali; Mohammed Sahsah; Ali A Terra; Elijah O Kehinde
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Considerations in minimally invasive surgery for renal and ureteric calculi: a bicenter quality control study.

Authors:  Saskia Weltings; Hossain Roshani; Joost Leenarts; Rob Pelger
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-02-10

5.  Retrospective Analysis of the Risk Factors and Drug Resistance of Pathogenic Bacteria in Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Impacted Ureteral Calculi.

Authors:  Quangang Yuan; Jiang Guo; Long He; Qiulin Chen; Xianhong Zou; Siming Yang; Zhenyang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-12

6.  Holmium laser lithotripsy with semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a first-choice treatment for impacted ureteral stones in children?

Authors:  Senol Adanur; Hasan Riza Aydin; Fatih Ozkaya; Tevfik Ziypak; Ozkan Polat
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-11-21

7.  Reporting ureteroscopy complications using the modified clavien classification system.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  Jaap D Legemate; Nienke J Wijnstok; Tadashi Matsuda; Willem Strijbos; Tibet Erdogru; Beat Roth; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Judith Palacios-Ramos; Roberto M Scarpa; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting patients with impacted ureteral stone: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Chenglu Wang; Lu Jin; Xinyang Zhao; Boxin Xue; Min Zheng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an entrapment and extraction device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Waleed Shabana; Mohamed Teleb; Tamer Dawod
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.