Literature DB >> 9762995

Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment.

J R Fielding1, S G Silverman, S Samuel, K H Zou, K R Loughlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether unenhanced helical CT alone can be used for diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with obstructing ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 100 patients with ureteral stones and a clearly discernible clinical outcome who had undergone unenhanced helical CT were reviewed to determine the number of urography procedures and results of excretory urograms performed within 72 hr of helical CT. CT scans were then reviewed by two radiologists for six findings: in-plane stone diameter, z-axis stone diameter, location of stone, periureteral stranding, hydronephrosis, and perinephric fluid. Seventy-one patients passed stones spontaneously, and 29 patients required intervention including basket retrieval, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, laser lithotripsy, or a combination of the three treatments. Data were analyzed to determine those findings that correlated with the need for intervention.
RESULTS: Five excretory urograms were obtained, all of which agreed with findings revealed by CT. Excretory urography added no information. CT findings of in-plane diameter (p < .001), z -axis diameter (p < .001), and location of stone (p = .003) all significantly correlated with the need for intervention.
CONCLUSION: Helical CT can be used in place of excretory urography to plan treatment of patients with flank pain caused by obstructing ureteral stones. Stones that are larger than 5 mm, located within the proximal two thirds of the ureter, and seen on two or more consecutive CT images are more likely to require endoscopic removal, lithotripsy, or both.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762995     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen.

Authors:  Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Multislice CT urography Aspects for technical management and clinical application].

Authors:  J Kemper; G Adam; C Nolte-Ernsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Consistency of Renal Stone Volume Measurements Across CT Scanner Model and Reconstruction Algorithm Configurations.

Authors:  Alice E Huang; Juan C Montoya; Maria Shiung; Shuai Leng; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  In-vitro comparison of different slice thicknesses and kernel settings for measurement of urinary stone size by computed tomography.

Authors:  Roland Umbach; Jochen-Klaus Müller; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Site of impaction of ureteric calculi requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ehab El-Barky; Yusuf Ali; Mohammed Sahsah; Ali A Terra; Elijah O Kehinde
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  CT urography for hematuria.

Authors:  Nigel C Cowan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Is computed tomography-defined obstruction a predictor of urological intervention in emergency department patients presenting with renal colic?

Authors:  Peter Alexander Massaro; Avinash Kanji; Paul Atkinson; Ryan Pawsey; Tom Whelan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.

Authors:  Wayne Brisbane; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  S A Pfister; A Deckart; S Laschke; S Dellas; U Otto; C Buitrago; J Roth; W Wiesner; G Bongartz; T C Gasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Statistical validation based on parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis of continuous classification data.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Julia R Fielding; Clare M C Tempany; M Wells William; Michael R Kaus; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.