Literature DB >> 17459573

Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy.

Christian Seitz1, Enis Tanovic, Zeljko Kikic, Harun Fajkovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The impact and outcome of holmium:YAG-laser (Ho:YAG) ureterolithotripsy in treating proximal and distal ureteral stones was investigated.
METHODS: A total of 543 patients harbouring proximal (n=194) or distal (n=349) ureteral stones underwent semirigid Ho:YAG ureterolithotripsy. The degree of hydronephrosis; stone size, location, impaction, and composition; and complication and stone-free rates were recorded.
RESULTS: Mean stone size for proximal and distal stones was 7.1+/-3.6 mm and 6.2+/-2.5 mm, respectively. The stone-free rate on the first postoperative day was 79.4% for proximal and 96.8% for distal stones (p<0.0001). For proximal stones <10mm and > or =10mm, respectively, the stone-free rate was 80.5% and 74.3% (p=0.4) and for distal stones 97.3% and 94.3% (p=0.2). Stone-free rates for radio-opaque versus radiolucent stones in proximal stones were 79.6% versus 77.9% (p=0.8) and 97.6% versus 96.2% in distal stones (p=0.5). Impaction correlated significantly with stone-free rates (p<0.0001). Stone-free rates for nonimpacted versus impacted proximal stones were 85.8% versus 67.2% (p=0.003) and for distal stones 99.2% versus 91.4% (p<0.003), respectively. The presence or degree of hydronephrosis did not correlate with treatment success (p=0.4, p=0.8). The presence of intraoperative complications correlated significantly with proximal compared to distal ureteral stone location (p=0.004). Auxiliary measures in proximal versus distal stones were performed in 20.6% versus 2.9% (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, stone-free rates in Ho:YAG ureterolithotripsy were significantly higher in distal and nonimpacted stones but were independent of stone size and composition and the degree of hydronephrosis. Ureterolithotripsy in proximal stones was associated with higher intraoperative complication and retreatment rates compared to distal stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459573     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  26 in total

1.  Fragmentation without extraction in ureteral stones: outcomes of 238 cases.

Authors:  Cemal Göktaş; Rahim Horuz; Oktay Akça; Ali Cihangir Cetinel; Selami Albayrak; Kemal Sarıca
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-10-18

2.  Sudden onset of a huge subcapsular renal hematoma following minimally invasive ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: A case report.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Wan-Li Hu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Burak Arslan; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Omer Koras
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Role of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is a reliable method for urinary stone analysis.

Authors:  Nazım Mutlu; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Turgay Gülecen; Belgin Genç Öztoprak; Arif Demir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-03

6.  Site of impaction of ureteric calculi requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ehab El-Barky; Yusuf Ali; Mohammed Sahsah; Ali A Terra; Elijah O Kehinde
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Subcapsular renal hematoma after ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Wei Tao; Chun Jie Cai; Chuan Yang Sun; Bo Xin Xue; Yu Xi Shan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Does a retropulsion prevention device equalize the surgical success of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripters for upper ureteral stones? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Sahin Bagbanci; Mumtaz Dadali; Yeliz Dadalı; Levent Emir; Ozkan Gorgulu; Ayhan Karabulut
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.

Authors:  Xiao-Jian Gu; Jian Lin Lu; Yan Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.

Authors:  L Dell'Atti; Sergio Papa
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.