Literature DB >> 19450856

Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic.

Brian H Eisner1, Adam Reese, Sonali Sheth, Marshall L Stoller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is thought that the 3 narrowest points of the ureter are the ureteropelvic junction, the point where the ureter crosses anterior to the iliac vessels and the ureterovesical junction. Textbooks describe these 3 sites as the most likely places for ureteral stones to lodge. We defined the stone position in the ureter when patients first present to the emergency department with colic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 94 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of colic and computerized tomography showing a single unilateral ureteral calculus. Axial, coronal and 3-dimensional reformatted computerized tomography scans were evaluated, and stone position and size (maximal axial and coronal diameters) were recorded, as were the position of the ureteropelvic junction, the iliac vessels (where the ureter crosses anterior to the iliac vessels) and the ureterovesical junction. Patients with a history of nephrolithiasis, shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotripsy were excluded from study. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: At the time of emergency department presentation for colic ureteral stone position was the ureteropelvic junction in 10.6% cases, between the ureteropelvic junction and the iliac vessels in 23.4%, where the ureter crosses anterior to the iliac vessels in 1.1%, between the iliac vessels and the ureterovesical junction in 4.3% and at the ureterovesical junction in 60.6%. Proximal calculi had a greater axial diameter than distal calculi (mean 6.1 vs 4.0 mm) and a greater coronal diameter than distal calculi (6.8 vs 4.1 mm, each p <0.001). Axial and coronal diameters moderately correlated with stone position (r = -0.47 and -0.55, respectively, each p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal ureteral stones were larger in axial and coronal diameter than distal ureteral stones. At emergency department presentation for colic most stones were at the ureterovesical junction and in the proximal ureter between the ureteropelvic junction and the iliac vessels. A few stones were at the ureteropelvic junction and only 1 lodged at the level where the ureter crosses anterior to the iliac vessels, despite the literature stating that these locations are 2 of the 3 most likely places for stones to become lodged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19450856     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Managing Small Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Study on Follow-Up, Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Conservative Management vs. Early Surgery.

Authors:  Aristeidis Alevizopoulos; Dimitrios Zosimas; Lamprini Piha; Milad Hanna; Konstantinos Charitopoulos
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-02-10

2.  Kinking of the upper ureter in CT urography: anatomic and clinical significance.

Authors:  Minobu Kamo; Taiki Nozaki; Kyoko Yoshida; Ukihide Tateishi; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Site of impaction of ureteric calculi requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ehab El-Barky; Yusuf Ali; Mohammed Sahsah; Ali A Terra; Elijah O Kehinde
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Increased urinary bladder volume improves the detectability of urinary stones at the ureterovesical junction in non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT).

Authors:  Maxim Avanesov; Julja Togmat; Mehtap Solmaz; Michael Gerhard Kaul; Azien Laqmani; Helena Guerreiro; Sarah Keller; Lars Weisbach; Gerhard Adam; Jin Yamamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Update on the pathophysiology and management of uric acid renal stones.

Authors:  Jon-Emile S Kenny; David S Goldfarb
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Investigation of the location of the ureteral stone and diameter of the ureter in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Ha-Jong Song; Sung-Tae Cho; Ki-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

7.  To compare the efficacy of tamsulosin and alfuzosin as medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Rikki Singal; Gaurav Bhatia; Amit Mittal; Samita Singal; Muzzafar Zaman
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Factors affecting the urologist's decision to administer ureteral stone therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mun Ki Min; Ji Ho Ryu; Yong In Kim; Maeng Real Park; Seok Ran Yeom; Sang Kyoon Han; Seong Wook Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-30

9.  Efficacy of alfuzosin after shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Hee Ju Cho; Soon Cheol Shin; Do Young Seo; Dong Suk Min; Jeong Man Cho; Jung Yoon Kang; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-02-18

10.  Distribution of ureteral stones and factors affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Young Joon Moon; Hong-Wook Kim; Jin Bum Kim; Hyung Joon Kim; Young-Seop Chang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.