Literature DB >> 18294030

Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: predictive factors for complications and success.

Joost A P Leijte1, Jorg R Oddens, Tycho M T W Lock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define possible predictive factors for success and complications for ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 105 ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy procedures performed between 1996 and 2005 were analyzed. Data recorded were sex, age, stone size, stone location, complications, success rate (stone-free rate after 3 months), operative time, and surgeon experience for this procedure. For further analysis, surgeon experience was divided into four groups based on the number of procedures performed. Multivariate analysis was used to define possible predictive factors for complications and successful procedures.
RESULTS: Total success rate was 84.8%. Complications were present in 13 patients (12.4%). Success rate was significantly (P = 0.03) related to surgeon experience, with 92.9% success in the most experienced group and 50% in the least experienced group. Furthermore, significantly more complications occurred with decreased experience (P = 0.03): complication rate was 4.2% in the highest experience group and 41.7% in the least experienced group. In our series, sex, stone location, size, and age did not significantly influence complication and success rates.
CONCLUSION: Surgeon experience is a predictive factor for complications and success for ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteric calculi. Experienced surgeons have fewer complications, and the success rate is higher. Sex, stone location, size, and age were not significantly related to complication or success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294030     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  21 in total

1.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Evaluation of ureteroscopy outcome in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Abdulla Al-Naimi; Abdulqadir Alobaidy; Ahmad Majzoub; Tarek Ahmed Amin Ibrahim
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

3.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Burak Arslan; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Omer Koras
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Role of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Site of impaction of ureteric calculi requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ehab El-Barky; Yusuf Ali; Mohammed Sahsah; Ali A Terra; Elijah O Kehinde
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.

Authors:  Xiao-Jian Gu; Jian Lin Lu; Yan Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.

Authors:  L Dell'Atti; Sergio Papa
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

9.  Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Berkan Resorlu; Tolga Sahin; Selcuk Sarikaya; Mirze Bayindir; Ural Oguz; Abdullah Armagan; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Impaction of ureteral stones into the ureteral wall: Is it possible to predict?

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Bilal Eryildirim; Cahit Sahin; Kubilay Sabuncu; Cihangir Cetinel; Fehmi Narter
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.