Literature DB >> 24049129

Quality assurance evaluation of spot scanning beam proton therapy with an anthropomorphic prostate phantom.

K Iqbal1, M Gillin, P A Summers, S Dhanesar, K A Gifford, S A Buzdar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate spot scanning proton therapy with an anthropomorphic prostate phantom at the Proton Therapy Center of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center at Houston, TX (PTCH).
METHODS: An anthropomorphic prostate phantom from the Radiological Physics Center (RPC), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, was used, which contained thermoluminescent dosemeters and GAFCHROMIC(®) EBT2 film (ISP Technologies, Wayne, NJ). The phantom was irradiated by the Hitachi synchrotron (Hitachi America, Ltd, Tarrytown, NY), and the results were compared between the treatment planning system (TPS) and RPC measurements.
RESULTS: RPC results show that the right/left, inferior/superior and posterior/anterior aspects of the coronal/sagittal and EBT2 film measurements were within ±7%/±4 mm of the TPS. The RPC thermoluminescent dosemeter measurements of the prostate and femoral heads were within 3% of the TPS.
CONCLUSION: The RPC prostate phantom is a useful mechanism to evaluate spot scanning beam proton therapy within certain confidence levels. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The RPC anthropomorphic prostate phantom could be used to establish quality assurance of spot scanning proton beam for patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24049129      PMCID: PMC3830437          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method.

Authors:  Daniel A Low; James F Dempsey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Angel I Blanco; Vanessa H Clark
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Relationship between electron density and effective densities of body tissues for stopping, scattering, and nuclear interactions of proton and ion beams.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kanematsu; Taku Inaniwa; Yusuke Koba
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.

Authors:  Alfred Smith; Michael Gillin; Martin Bues; X Ronald Zhu; Kazumichi Suzuki; Radhe Mohan; Shiao Woo; Andrew Lee; Ritsko Komaki; James Cox; Kazuo Hiramoto; Hiroshi Akiyama; Takayuki Ishida; Toshie Sasaki; Koji Matsuda
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston.

Authors:  Michael T Gillin; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; George Ciangaru; Gabriel Sawakuchi; Falk Poenisch; Bijan Arjomandy; Craig Martin; Uwe Titt; Kazumichi Suzuki; Alfred R Smith; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Evaluation of a Gafchromic EBT2 film dosimetry system for radiotherapy quality assurance.

Authors:  T Aland; T Kairn; J Kenny
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.430

8.  Compensation for inhomogeneities in charged particle radiotherapy using computed tomography.

Authors:  M Goitein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Spot scanning system for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  T Kanai; K Kawachi; Y Kumamoto; H Ogawa; T Yamada; H Matsuzawa; T Inada
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Urie; M Goitein; M Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  X Ronald Zhu; Yupeng Li; Dennis Mackin; Heng Li; Falk Poenisch; Andrew K Lee; Anita Mahajan; Steven J Frank; Michael T Gillin; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.

Authors:  Ulrich W Langner; Michelle Mundis; Dan Strauss; Mingyao Zhu; Sina Mossahebi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Comparison of multi-institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data.

Authors:  Ulrich W Langner; John G Eley; Lei Dong; Katja Langen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.