Literature DB >> 12773007

CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research.

Joseph O Deasy1, Angel I Blanco, Vanessa H Clark.   

Abstract

A software environment is described, called the computational environment for radiotherapy research (CERR, pronounced "sir"). CERR partially addresses four broad needs in treatment planning research: (a) it provides a convenient and powerful software environment to develop and prototype treatment planning concepts, (b) it serves as a software integration environment to combine treatment planning software written in multiple languages (MATLAB, FORTRAN, C/C++, JAVA, etc.), together with treatment plan information (computed tomography scans, outlined structures, dose distributions, digital films, etc.), (c) it provides the ability to extract treatment plans from disparate planning systems using the widely available AAPM/RTOG archiving mechanism, and (d) it provides a convenient and powerful tool for sharing and reproducing treatment planning research results. The functional components currently being distributed, including source code, include: (1) an import program which converts the widely available AAPM/RTOG treatment planning format into a MATLAB cell-array data object, facilitating manipulation; (2) viewers which display axial, coronal, and sagittal computed tomography images, structure contours, digital films, and isodose lines or dose colorwash, (3) a suite of contouring tools to edit and/or create anatomical structures, (4) dose-volume and dose-surface histogram calculation and display tools, and (5) various predefined commands. CERR allows the user to retrieve any AAPM/RTOG key word information about the treatment plan archive. The code is relatively self-describing, because it relies on MATLAB structure field name definitions based on the AAPM/RTOG standard. New structure field names can be added dynamically or permanently. New components of arbitrary data type can be stored and accessed without disturbing system operation. CERR has been applied to aid research in dose-volume-outcome modeling, Monte Carlo dose calculation, and treatment planning optimization. In summary, CERR provides a powerful, convenient, and common framework which allows researchers to use common patient data sets, and compare and share research results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773007     DOI: 10.1118/1.1568978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  222 in total

1.  Variation in the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume for preoperative radiotherapy of primary large high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity among RTOG sarcoma radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Dian Wang; Walter Bosch; David G Kirsch; Rawan Al Lozi; Issam El Naqa; David Roberge; Steven E Finkelstein; Ivy Petersen; Michael Haddock; Yen-Lin E Chen; Naoyuki G Saito; Ying J Hitchcock; Aaron H Wolfson; Thomas F DeLaney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Multicriteria VMAT optimization.

Authors:  David Craft; Dualta McQuaid; Jeremiah Wala; Wei Chen; Ehsan Salari; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Feasibility of in situ, high-resolution correlation of tracer uptake with histopathology by quantitative autoradiography of biopsy specimens obtained under 18F-FDG PET/CT guidance.

Authors:  Louise M Fanchon; Snjezana Dogan; Andre L Moreira; Sean A Carlin; C Ross Schmidtlein; Ellen Yorke; Aditya P Apte; Irene A Burger; Jeremy C Durack; Joseph P Erinjeri; Majid Maybody; Heiko Schöder; Robert H Siegelbaum; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Joseph O Deasy; Stephen B Solomon; John L Humm; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Improving normal tissue complication probability models: the need to adopt a "data-pooling" culture.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Søren M Bentzen; Andrew Jackson; Randall K Ten Haken; Ellen D Yorke; Louis S Constine; Ashish Sharma; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Hippocampal sparing radiotherapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: impact of treatment margins and treatment technique.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Malin Blomstrand; Anne Kiil-Berthlesen; Christian Hollensen; Ivan R Vogelius; Birgitta Lannering; Søren M Bentzen; Thomas Björk-Eriksson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Prognostic value of metabolic metrics extracted from baseline positron emission tomography images in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sara Carvalho; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Cary Oberije; Chintan Parmar; Wouter van Elmpt; Bart Reymen; Esther G C Troost; Michel Oellers; Andre Dekker; Robert Gillies; Hugo J W L Aerts; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability.

Authors:  Ralph T H Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Wouter J C van Elmpt; Chintan Parmar; Otto S Hoekstra; Corneline J Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; André L A J Dekker; Robert J Gillies; Hugo J W L Aerts; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  End-of-Range Radiobiological Effect on Rib Fractures in Patients Receiving Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Wang; Aimee L McNamara; Jungwook Shin; Jan Schuemann; Clemens Grassberger; Alphonse G Taghian; Rachel B Jimenez; Shannon M MacDonald; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Influence of image slice thickness on rectal dose-response relationships following radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Olsson; M Thor; M Liu; V Moissenko; S E Petersen; M Høyer; A Apte; J O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.