Literature DB >> 19810479

The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.

Alfred Smith1, Michael Gillin, Martin Bues, X Ronald Zhu, Kazumichi Suzuki, Radhe Mohan, Shiao Woo, Andrew Lee, Ritsko Komaki, James Cox, Kazuo Hiramoto, Hiroshi Akiyama, Takayuki Ishida, Toshie Sasaki, Koji Matsuda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe the University of Texas M. D. Anderson proton therapy system (PTC-H) including the accelerator, beam transport, and treatment delivery systems, the functionality and clinical parameters for passive scattering and pencil beam scanning treatment modes, and the results of acceptance tests.
METHODS: The PTC-H has a synchrotron (70-250 MeV) and four treatment rooms. An overall control system manages the treatment, physics, and service modes of operation. An independent safety system ensures the safety of patients, staff, and equipment. Three treatment rooms have isocentric gantries and one room has two fixed horizontal beamlines, which include a large-field treatment nozzle, used primarily for prostate treatments, and a small-field treatment nozzle for ocular treatments. Two gantry treatment rooms and the fixed-beam treatment room have passive scattering nozzles. The third gantry has a pencil beam scanning nozzle for the delivery of intensity modulated proton treatments (IMPT) and single field uniform dose (SFUD) treatments. The PTC-H also has an experimental room with a fixed horizontal beamline and a passive scattering nozzle. The equipment described above was provided by Hitachi, Ltd. Treatment planning is performed using the Eclipse system from Varian Medical Systems and data management is handled by the MOSAIQ system from IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. The large-field passive scattering nozzles use double scattering systems in which the first scatterers are physically integrated with the range modulation wheels. The proton beam is gated on the rotating range modulation wheels at gating angles designed to produce spread-out-Bragg peaks ranging in size from 2 to 16 g/cm2. Field sizes of up to 25 x 25 cm2 can be achieved with the double scattering system. The IMPT delivery technique is discrete spot scanning, which has a maximum field size of 30 x 30 cm2. Depth scanning is achieved by changing the energy extracted from the synchrotron (energy can be changed pulse to pulse). The PTC-H is fully integrated with DICOM-RT ION interfaces for imaging, treatment planning, data management, and treatment control functions.
RESULTS: The proton therapy system passed all acceptance tests for both passive scattering and pencil beam scanning. Treatments with passive scattering began in May 2006 and treatments with the scanning system began in May 2008. The PTC-H was the first commercial system to demonstrate capabilities for IMPT treatments and the first in the United States to treat using SFUD techniques. The facility has been in clinical operation since May 2006 with up-time of approximately 98%.
CONCLUSIONS: As with most projects for which a considerable amount of new technology is developed and which have duration spanning several years, at project completion it was determined that several upgrades would improve the overall system performance. Some possible upgrades are discussed. Overall, the system has been very robust, accurate, reproducible, and reliable. The authors found the pencil beam scanning system to be particularly satisfactory; prostate treatments can be delivered on the scanning nozzle in less time than is required on the passive scattering nozzle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19810479     DOI: 10.1118/1.3187229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  49 in total

1.  Quality assurance evaluation of spot scanning beam proton therapy with an anthropomorphic prostate phantom.

Authors:  K Iqbal; M Gillin; P A Summers; S Dhanesar; K A Gifford; S A Buzdar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Optimizing a three-stage Compton camera for measuring prompt gamma rays emitted during proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  S W Peterson; D Robertson; J Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Image guidance in proton therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Wei Zou; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

4.  Secondary neutron spectrum from 250-MeV passively scattered proton therapy: measurement with an extended-range Bonner sphere system.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; E A Burgett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.

Authors:  X R Zhu; N Sahoo; X Zhang; D Robertson; H Li; S Choi; A K Lee; M T Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.

Authors:  Steven J Frank; James D Cox; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Jan S Lewin; Mark F Munsell; Matthew B Palmer; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Laleh Kardar; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Wenhua Cao; Joe Y Chang; Li Liao; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Gino Lim; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12

9.  A new concept for verifying the isocentric alignment of the proton-rotational gantry for radiation control.

Authors:  Takahiro Kato; Yuhei Yamazaki; Tatsuhiko Sagara
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-11-09

10.  Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance.

Authors:  Heng Li; Narayan Sahoo; Falk Poenisch; Kazumichi Suzuki; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Andrew K Lee; Michael T Gillin; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.