Literature DB >> 28128638

Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of two cone beam computed tomography protocols in reliably detecting the location of the inferior alveolar nerve canal.

Aditya Tadinada1, Sydney Schneider2, Sumit Yadav3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reliable three-dimensional localization of the inferior alveolar nerve canal (IANC) is valuable for a variety of dentoalveolar procedures. Although conventional CBCT offers three-dimensional information at a reasonably low dose, it is still a significant amount of radiation. In this ex vivo study, we evaluated the ability of a 180° rotational CBCT acquisition protocol with lower number of basis projections to create a CBCT data set for reliable localization of the IANC compared with a conventional 360° rotational CBCT acquisition.
METHODS: 50 dry human skulls were imaged using 180° and 360° rotational CBCT protocols. Measurements of the IANC throughout its course in the mandible were carried out. Two raters evaluated the measurements and rated the scans based on their ability to visualize the IANC, and the measurements were carried out.
RESULTS: The IANC length measurements for the 180° and 360° protocols were identical. There was no difference between evaluations by the two raters for the two protocols. Interexaminer reliability values were >90% for the two protocols. The sensitivity values for the two protocols were >95%. The specificity for both protocols was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: 180° CBCT acquisition protocol is able to accurately locate the IANC with high reliability and is comparable to a conventional 360° protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; dental implants; inferior alveolar nerve; oral radiology; tooth extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28128638      PMCID: PMC5595034          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  16 in total

1.  Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report.

Authors:  Erika Benavides; Hector F Rios; Scott D Ganz; Chang-Hyeon An; Randolph Resnik; Gayle Tieszen Reardon; Steven J Feldman; James K Mah; David Hatcher; Myung-Jin Kim; Dong-Seok Sohn; Ady Palti; Morton L Perel; Kenneth W M Judy; Carl E Misch; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 2.  Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints.

Authors:  S Barghan; S Tetradis; Sm Mallya
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.291

3.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

4.  Automatic extraction of inferior alveolar nerve canal using feature-enhancing panoramic volume rendering.

Authors:  Gyehyun Kim; Jeongjin Lee; Ho Lee; Jinwook Seo; Yun-Mo Koo; Yeong-Gil Shin; Bohyoung Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of 2 cone-beam computed tomography protocols for detecting arthritic changes in temporomandibular joints.

Authors:  Sumit Yadav; Ledjo Palo; Mina Mahdian; Madhur Upadhyay; Aditya Tadinada
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device.

Authors:  Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Frederico Sampaio Neves; Saulo Leonardo Sousa Melo; Paulo Sérgio Flores Campos; Francisco Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-01

7.  The detection of simulated periapical lesions in human dry mandibles with cone-beam computed tomography: a dose reduction study.

Authors:  N Al-Nuaimi; S Patel; F Foschi; F Mannocci
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  The dentate adult human mandible: an anatomic basis for surgical decision making.

Authors:  V V Haribhakti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Silkosessak; R Jacobs; R Bogaerts; H Bosmans; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario.

Authors:  Bhuvana Krishnamoorthy; Ns Mamatha; Vinod Ar Kumar
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.