Literature DB >> 27709910

Scenarios for Low Carbon and Low Water Electric Power Plant Operations: Implications for Upstream Water Use.

Rebecca S Dodder1, Jessica T Barnwell2, William H Yelverton1.   

Abstract

Electric sector water use, in particular for thermoelectric operations, is a critical component of the water-energy nexus. On a life cycle basis per unit of electricity generated, operational (e.g., cooling system) water use is substantially higher than water demands for the fuel cycle (e.g., natural gas and coal) and power plant manufacturing (e.g., equipment and construction). However, could shifting toward low carbon and low water electric power operations create trade-offs across the electricity life cycle? We compare business-as-usual with scenarios of carbon reductions and water constraints using the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) energy system model. Our scenarios show that, for water withdrawals, the trade-offs are minimal: operational water use accounts for over 95% of life cycle withdrawals. For water consumption, however, this analysis identifies potential trade-offs under some scenarios. Nationally, water use for the fuel cycle and power plant manufacturing can reach up to 26% of the total life cycle consumption. In the western United States, nonoperational consumption can even exceed operational demands. In particular, water use for biomass feedstock irrigation and manufacturing/construction of solar power facilities could increase with high deployment. As the United States moves toward lower carbon electric power operations, consideration of shifting water demands can help avoid unintended consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27709910      PMCID: PMC7364179          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  20 in total

1.  Sustainability and energy development: influences of greenhouse gas emission reduction options on water use in energy production.

Authors:  D Craig Cooper; Gerald Sehlke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Life cycle water use of energy production and its environmental impacts in China.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Laura Diaz Anadon
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Emissions implications of future natural gas production and use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain region.

Authors:  Jeffrey D McLeod; Gregory L Brinkman; Jana B Milford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Chiu; May Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Water|energy energy|water.

Authors:  Darcy J Gentleman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Role of lignin in reducing life-cycle carbon emissions, water use, and cost for United States cellulosic biofuels.

Authors:  Corinne D Scown; Amit A Gokhale; Paul A Willems; Arpad Horvath; Thomas E McKone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Regional allocation of biomass to U.S. energy demands under a portfolio of policy scenarios.

Authors:  Kimberley A Mullins; Aranya Venkatesh; Amy L Nagengast; Matt Kocoloski
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  The water footprint of California's energy system, 1990-2012.

Authors:  Julian Fulton; Heather Cooley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Potential impacts of electric power production utilizing natural gas, renewables and carbon capture and sequestration on US Freshwater resources.

Authors:  Vincent C Tidwell; Leonard A Malczynski; Peter H Kobos; Geoffrey T Klise; Erik Shuster
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.