Literature DB >> 29290754

Effects of recent energy system changes on CO2 projections for the United States.

Carol S Lenox1, Daniel H Loughlin1.   

Abstract

Recent projections of future United States carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are considerably lower than projections made just a decade ago. A myriad of factors have contributed to lower forecasts, including reductions in end-use energy service demands, improvements in energy efficiency, and technological innovations. Policies that have encouraged these changes include renewable portfolio standards, corporate vehicle efficiency standards, smart growth initiatives, revisions to building codes, and air and climate regulations. Understanding the effects of these and other factors can be advantageous as society evaluates opportunities for achieving additional CO2 reductions. Energy system models provide a means to develop such insights. In this analysis, the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) model was applied to estimate the relative effects of various energy system changes that have happened since the year 2005 on CO2 projections for the year 2025. The results indicate that transformations in the transportation and buildings sectors have played major roles in lowering projections. Particularly influential changes include improved vehicle efficiencies, reductions in projected travel demand, reductions in miscellaneous commercial electricity loads, and higher efficiency lighting. Electric sector changes have also contributed significantly to the lowered forecasts, driven by demand reductions, renewable portfolio standards, and air quality regulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; emissions projections; energy modeling; energy system

Year:  2017        PMID: 29290754      PMCID: PMC5746195          DOI: 10.1007/s10098-017-1417-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy        ISSN: 1618-954X            Impact factor:   3.636


  4 in total

1.  Role of future scenarios in understanding deep uncertainty in long-term air quality management.

Authors:  Julia Gamas; Rebecca Dodder; Dan Loughlin; Cynthia Gage
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy.

Authors:  Farhan H Akhtar; Robert W Pinder; Daniel H Loughlin; Daven K Henze
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Daven K Henze; Jana B Milford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.

Authors:  Jason Rudokas; Paul J Miller; Marcus A Trail; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.028

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Troy A Hottle; Rubenka Bandyopadhyay; Samaneh Babaee; Rebecca S Dodder; P Ozge Kaplan; Carol S Lenox; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Energy and emissions implications of automated vehicles in the U.S. energy system.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Rebecca Dodder
Journal:  Transp Res D Transp Environ       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 5.495

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.