Literature DB >> 24035621

Characterization of thyroid cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques.

Roberto J Lavarello1, William R Ridgway, Sandhya S Sarwate, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

Currently, the evaluation of thyroid cancer relies on the use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy, as non-invasive imaging methods do not provide sufficient levels of accuracy for the diagnosis of this disease. In this study, the potential of quantitative ultrasound methods for characterization of thyroid tissues was studied using a rodent model ex vivo. A high-frequency ultrasonic scanning system (40 MHz) was used to scan thyroids extracted from mice that had spontaneously developed thyroid lesions (cancerous or benign). Three sets of mice were acquired having different predispositions to developing three thyroid anomalies: C-cell adenoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FV-PTC). A fourth set of mice that did not develop thyroid anomalies (normal mice) were used as controls. The backscatter coefficient was estimated from excised thyroid lobes the different mice. From the backscatter coefficient versus frequency (25-45 MHz), the effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC) were estimated. From the envelope of the backscattered signal, the homodyned K distribution was used to estimate the k parameter (ratio of coherent to incoherent signal energy) and the μ parameter (number of scatterers per resolution cell). Statistically significant differences were observed between cancerous thyroids and normal thyroids based on the ESD, EAC and μ parameters. The mean ESD values were 18.0 ± 0.92, 15.9 ± 0.81 and 21.5 ± 1.80 μm for the PTC, FV-PTC and normal thyroids, respectively. The mean EAC values were 59.4 ± 1.74, 62.7 ± 1.61 and 52.9 ± 3.42 dB (mm(-3)) for the PTC, FV-PTC and normal thyroids, respectively. The mean μ values were 2.55 ± 0.37, 2.59 ± 0.43 and 1.56 ± 0.99 for the PTC, FV-PTC and normal thyroids, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between cancerous thyroids and C-cell adenomas based on the ESD and EAC parameters, with an estimated ESD value of 21.3 ± 1.50 μm and EAC value of 54.7 ± 2.24 dB mm(-3) for C-cell adenomas. These results suggest that high-frequency quantitative ultrasound may enhance the ability to detect and classify diseased thyroid tissues.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer diagnosis; Quantitative ultrasound; Thyroid; Tissue characterization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24035621      PMCID: PMC3833975          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  38 in total

1.  New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Kim; Cheong Soo Park; Woung Youn Chung; Ki Keun Oh; Dong Ik Kim; Jong Tae Lee; Hyung Sik Yoo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Nonpalpable thyroid nodules--managing an epidemic.

Authors:  Douglas S Ross
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Attenuation coefficient measurement in the thyroid.

Authors:  Yasutomo Fujii; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Kouichi Itoh; Kiyoka Omoto
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Initial clinical experience imaging scatterer size and strain in thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Thaddeus Wilson; Quan Chen; James A Zagzebski; Tomy Varghese; Lester VanMiddlesworth
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ultrasonic attenuation estimation of the pregnant cervix: a preliminary report.

Authors:  B L McFarlin; T A Bigelow; Y Laybed; W D O'Brien; M L Oelze; J S Abramowicz
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Real-time elastosonography: useful tool for refining the presurgical diagnosis in thyroid nodules with indeterminate or nondiagnostic cytology.

Authors:  T Rago; M Scutari; F Santini; V Loiacono; P Piaggi; G Di Coscio; F Basolo; P Berti; A Pinchera; P Vitti
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Benign anatomical mistakes: incidentaloma.

Authors:  Petros Mirilas; J E Skandalakis
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Management of thyroid incidentalomas.

Authors:  Robert J Silver; Sareh Parangi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  14 in total

1.  Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.

Authors:  Trong N Nguyen; Alex J Tam; Minh N Do; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Effects of Signal Saturation on QUS Parameter Estimates Based on High-Frequency-Ultrasound Signals Acquired From Isolated Cancerous Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Kazuki Tamura; Jonathan Mamou; Alain Coron; Kenji Yoshida; Ernest J Feleppa; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Quantitative Ultrasound Comparison of MAT and 4T1 Mammary Tumors in Mice and Rats Across Multiple Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Goutam Ghoshal; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Yeonjoo Park; Alexander D Pawlicki; Rita J Miller; Douglas G Simpson; James A Zagzebski; Michael L Oelze; Timothy J Hall; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Disease-Specific Imaging Utilizing Support Vector Machine Classification of H-Scan Parameters: Assessment of Steatosis in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Jihye Baek; Lokesh Basavarajappa; Kenneth Hoyt; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Total attenuation compensation for backscatter coefficient estimation using full angular spatial compounding.

Authors:  Andres Coila; Julien Rouyer; Omar Zenteno; Adam Luchies; Michael L Oelze; Roberto Lavarello
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 7.  Preclinical Imaging for the Study of Mouse Models of Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Adelaide Greco; Luigi Auletta; Francesca Maria Orlandella; Paola Lucia Chiara Iervolino; Michele Klain; Giuliana Salvatore; Marcello Mancini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  H-scan analysis of thyroid lesions.

Authors:  Gary R Ge; Rosa Laimes; Joseph Pinto; Jorge Guerrero; Himelda Chavez; Claudia Salazar; Roberto J Lavarello; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-07

9.  Breast lesion characterization using Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) and derivative texture methods.

Authors:  Laurentius O Osapoetra; Lakshmanan Sannachi; Daniel DiCenzo; Karina Quiaoit; Kashuf Fatima; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Breast-Lesion Characterization using Textural Features of Quantitative Ultrasound Parametric Maps.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Harini Suraweera; William Tyler Tran; Farnoosh Hadizad; Giancarlo Bruni; Rashin Fallah Rastegar; Belinda Curpen; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.