Literature DB >> 23062376

Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.

Goutam Ghoshal1, Roberto J Lavarello, Jeremy P Kemmerer, Rita J Miller, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects more than 30% of Americans, and with increasing problems of obesity in the United States, NAFLD is poised to become an even more serious medical concern. At present, accurate classification of steatosis (fatty liver) represents a significant challenge. In this study, the use of high-frequency (8 to 25 MHz) quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging to quantify fatty liver was explored. QUS is an imaging technique that can be used to quantify properties of tissue giving rise to scattered ultrasound. The changes in the ultrasound properties of livers in rabbits undergoing atherogenic diets of varying durations were investigated using QUS. Rabbits were placed on a special fatty diet for 0, 3, or 6 weeks. The fattiness of the livers was quantified by estimating the total lipid content of the livers. Ultrasonic properties, such as speed of sound, attenuation, and backscatter coefficients, were estimated in ex vivo rabbit liver samples from animals that had been on the diet for varying periods. Two QUS parameters were estimated based on the backscatter coefficient: effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC), using a spherical Gaussian scattering model. Two parameters were estimated based on the backscattered envelope statistics (the k parameter and the μ parameter) according to the homodyned K distribution. The speed of sound decreased from 1574 to 1565 m/s and the attenuation coefficient increased from 0.71 to 1.27 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, with increasing fat content in the liver. The ESD decreased from 31 to 17 μm and the EAC increased from 38 to 63 dB/cm(3) with increasing fat content in the liver. A significant increase in the μ parameter from 0.18 to 0.93 scatterers/mm(3) was observed with increasing fat content in the liver samples. The results of this study indicate that QUS parameters are sensitive to fat content in the liver.
Copyright © 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23062376      PMCID: PMC3640816          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  47 in total

1.  Feasibility study of ultrasonic fatty liver biopsy: texture vs. attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Diana Gaitini; Yaacov Baruch; Eduard Ghersin; Ella Veitsman; Hedvika Kerner; Bruria Shalem; Geva Yaniv; Chen Sarfaty; Haim Azhari
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Tissue characterization based on scatterer number density estimation.

Authors:  G E Sleefe; P P Lele
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  The measurement of backscatter coefficient from a broadband pulse-echo system: a new formulation.

Authors:  X Chen; D Phillips; K Q Schwarz; J G Mottley; K J Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Correlation of ultrasonic attenuation with pathologic fat and fibrosis in liver disease.

Authors:  T Lin; J Ophir; G Potter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Sonographic diagnosis of diffuse liver disease.

Authors:  W J Zwiebel
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.875

7.  Correlation of paired liver biopsies in morbidly obese patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Raphael B Merriman; Linda D Ferrell; Marco G Patti; Shiobhan R Weston; Mark S Pabst; Bradley E Aouizerat; Nathan M Bass
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Ultrasonographic quantitative estimation of hepatic steatosis in children With NAFLD.

Authors:  Angela Shannon; Naim Alkhouri; Christine Carter-Kent; Lidia Monti; Rita Devito; Rocio Lopez; Ariel E Feldstein; Valerio Nobili
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 9.  Sonography of diffuse liver disease.

Authors:  Hisham Tchelepi; Philip W Ralls; Randall Radin; Edward Grant
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Fatty liver disease in severe obese patients: diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound.

Authors:  Alessandro de Moura Almeida; Helma Pinchemel Cotrim; Daniel Batista Valente Barbosa; Luciana Gordilho Matteoni de Athayde; Adimeia Souza Santos; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Luiz Antonio Rodrigues de Freitas; Adriano Rios; Erivaldo Alves
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  40 in total

1.  A Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme For Detection Of Fatty Liver In Vivo Based On Ultrasound Kurtosis Imaging.

Authors:  Hsiang-Yang Ma; Zhuhuang Zhou; Shuicai Wu; Yung-Liang Wan; Po-Hsiang Tsui
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Chandra Karunakaran; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Non-invasive speed of sound measurement in cartilage by use of combined magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: an initial study.

Authors:  Takako Aoki; Naotaka Nitta; Akira Furukawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-06-01

4.  Scattering by single physically large and weak scatterers in the beam of a single-element transducer.

Authors:  Jeremy P Kemmerer; Michael L Oelze; Miklós Gyöngy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Local speed of sound estimation in tissue using pulse-echo ultrasound: Model-based approach.

Authors:  Marko Jakovljevic; Scott Hsieh; Rehman Ali; Gustavo Chau Loo Kung; Dongwoon Hyun; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Fat Quantification in the Abdomen.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12

8.  Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.

Authors:  Eenas A Omari; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.

Authors:  Trong N Nguyen; Alex J Tam; Minh N Do; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Shapes and distributions of soft tissue scatterers.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.