Literature DB >> 21568393

On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Roberto J Lavarello1, Goutam Ghoshal, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging methods based on backscatter coefficient (BSC) estimates is to obtain system-independent structural information about samples. In the current study, three BSC estimation methods were compared and evaluated using the same backscattered pressure datasets in order to assess their consistency. BSC estimates were obtained from two phantoms with embedded glass spheres and compared to theoretical BSCs calculated using size distributions estimated using optical microscopy. Effective scatterer diameter and concentration estimates of the glass spheres were also obtained from the estimated BSCs. One estimation method needed to be compensated by more than an order of magnitude in amplitude in order to produce BSCs comparable to the other two methods. All calibration methods introduced different frequency-dependent effects, which could have noticeable effects on the bias of QUS estimates derived from experimental BSCs. Although in most cases the experimental QUS estimates obtained with all three methods were observed to differ by less than 10%, larger differences are expected depending on both the pressure focusing gain of the transducer (proportional to the ratio of the square of the aperture radius to the product of the wavelength and focal length) and ka range used in the estimation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568393      PMCID: PMC3114739          DOI: 10.1121/1.3557036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Correlation of ultrasonic scatterer size estimates for the statistical analysis and optimization of angular compounding.

Authors:  Anthony Gerig; Quan Chen; James Zagzebski; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Parametric ultrasound imaging from backscatter coefficient measurements: image formation and interpretation.

Authors:  M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  Relationship of ultrasonic spectral parameters to features of tissue microstructure.

Authors:  F L Lizzi; M Ostromogilsky; E J Feleppa; M C Rorke; M M Yaremko
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  The measurement of backscatter coefficient from a broadband pulse-echo system: a new formulation.

Authors:  X Chen; D Phillips; K Q Schwarz; J G Mottley; K J Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Ultrasound characterization of red blood cell aggregation with intervening attenuating tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Emilie Franceschini; François T H Yu; François Destrempes; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Estimating the spatial autocorrelation function for ultrasound scatterers in isotropic media.

Authors:  J F Chen; J A Zagzebski; F Dong; E L Madsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiation pattern of a focused transducer: a numerically convergent solution.

Authors:  X Chen; K Q Schwarz; K J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic coupling from a focused transducer to a flat plate and back to the transducer.

Authors:  X Chen; K Q Schwarz; K J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients.

Authors:  E L Madsen; M F Insana; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Janelle J Anderson; Maria-Teresa Herd; Michael R King; Alexander Haak; Zachary T Hafez; Jun Song; Michael L Oelze; Ernest L Madsen; James A Zagzebski; William D O'Brien; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.578

View more
  18 in total

1.  ULTRASOUND SPECTROSCOPY.

Authors:  S R Aylward; M McCormick; H J Kang; S Razzaque; R Kwitt; M Niethammer
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2016-06-16

2.  Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.

Authors:  Andres Coila; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.

Authors:  Scott M Leithem; Roberto J Lavarello; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.

Authors:  Trong N Nguyen; Alex J Tam; Minh N Do; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Using two-dimensional impedance maps to study weak scattering in sparse random media.

Authors:  Adam C Luchies; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of the container on structure function with impedance map analysis of dense scattering media.

Authors:  Adam C Luchies; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.

Authors:  Adam C Luchies; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions: effects of the size estimator algorithm.

Authors:  Roberto Lavarello; Michael Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.