Literature DB >> 26761606

Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Michael L Oelze, Jonathan Mamou.   

Abstract

Conventional medical imaging technologies, including ultrasound, have continued to improve over the years. For example, in oncology, medical imaging is characterized by high sensitivity, i.e., the ability to detect anomalous tissue features, but the ability to classify these tissue features from images often lacks specificity. As a result, a large number of biopsies of tissues with suspicious image findings are performed each year with a vast majority of these biopsies resulting in a negative finding. To improve specificity of cancer imaging, quantitative imaging techniques can play an important role. Conventional ultrasound B-mode imaging is mainly qualitative in nature. However, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging can provide specific numbers related to tissue features that can increase the specificity of image findings leading to improvements in diagnostic ultrasound. QUS imaging can encompass a wide variety of techniques including spectral-based parameterization, elastography, shear wave imaging, flow estimation, and envelope statistics. Currently, spectral-based parameterization and envelope statistics are not available on most conventional clinical ultrasound machines. However, in recent years, QUS techniques involving spectral-based parameterization and envelope statistics have demonstrated success in many applications, providing additional diagnostic capabilities. Spectral-based techniques include the estimation of the backscatter coefficient (BSC), estimation of attenuation, and estimation of scatterer properties such as the correlation length associated with an effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and the effective acoustic concentration (EAC) of scatterers. Envelope statistics include the estimation of the number density of scatterers and quantification of coherent to incoherent signals produced from the tissue. Challenges for clinical application include correctly accounting for attenuation effects and transmission losses and implementation of QUS on clinical devices. Successful clinical and preclinical applications demonstrating the ability of QUS to improve medical diagnostics include characterization of the myocardium during the cardiac cycle, cancer detection, classification of solid tumors and lymph nodes, detection and quantification of fatty liver disease, and monitoring and assessment of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26761606      PMCID: PMC5551399          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.2513958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  137 in total

1.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model.

Authors:  P M Shankar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution.

Authors:  P M Shankar; V A Dumane; J M Reid; V Genis; F Forsberg; C W Piccoli; B B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter using gate-edge correction and a pseudo-Welch technique.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Ultrasonic backscatter from flowing whole blood. II: Dependence on frequency and fibrinogen concentration.

Authors:  Y W Yuan; K K Shung
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Quantitative imaging of the cervix: setting the bar.

Authors:  H Feltovich; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Structure factor model for understanding the measured backscatter coefficients from concentrated cell pellet biophantoms.

Authors:  Emilie Franceschini; Régine Guillermin; Franck Tourniaire; Sandrine Roffino; Edouard Lamy; Jean-François Landrier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Abnormal myocardial acoustic properties in diabetic patients and their correlation with the severity of disease.

Authors:  J E Pérez; J B McGill; J V Santiago; K B Schechtman; A D Waggoner; J G Miller; B E Sobel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Ultrasound attenuation and texture analysis of diffuse liver disease: methods and preliminary results.

Authors:  B J Oosterveld; J M Thijssen; P C Hartman; R L Romijn; G J Rosenbusch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Quantitative ultrasound characterization of responses to radiotherapy in cancer mouse models.

Authors:  Roxana M Vlad; Sebastian Brand; Anoja Giles; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  51 in total

1.  Quantitative ultrasound and machine learning for assessment of steatohepatitis in a rat model.

Authors:  An Tang; François Destrempes; Siavash Kazemirad; Julian Garcia-Duitama; Bich N Nguyen; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Low Variance Estimation of Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Using Dynamic Programming.

Authors:  Zara Vajihi; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Timothy J Hall; Hassan Rivaz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery.

Authors:  Shayan Barootchi; Hsun-Liang Chan; Sharon S Namazi; Hom-Lay Wang; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.

Authors:  Trong N Nguyen; Alex J Tam; Minh N Do; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Using Quantitative US.

Authors:  Aiguo Han; Yingzhen N Zhang; Andrew S Boehringer; Vivian Montes; Michael P Andre; John W Erdman; Rohit Loomba; Mark A Valasek; Claude B Sirlin; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  System-Independent Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Using Spectra Normalization.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Chengwu Huang; Joshua Trzasko; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.

Authors:  Masaaki Omura; Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka; Kenji Yoshida; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Quantification of Muscle Tissue Properties by Modeling the Statistics of Ultrasound Image Intensities Using a Mixture of Gamma Distributions in Children With and Without Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Siddhartha Sikdar; Guoqing Diao; Diego Turo; Christopher J Stanley; Abhinav Sharma; Amy Chambliss; Loretta Laughrey; April Aralar; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Spatial Angular Compounding Technique for H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Mawia Khairalseed; Fangyuan Xiong; Jung-Whan Kim; Robert F Mattrey; Kevin J Parker; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Resolution of Murine Toxic Hepatic Injury Quantified With Ultrasound Entropy Metrics.

Authors:  Jon N Marsh; Kevin M Korenblat; Ta-Chiang Liu; John E McCarthy; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.