Literature DB >> 16870895

Initial clinical experience imaging scatterer size and strain in thyroid nodules.

Thaddeus Wilson1, Quan Chen, James A Zagzebski, Tomy Varghese, Lester VanMiddlesworth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article describes a new research ultrasound scanner that can be programmed to produce elastograms and backscatter parametric images in real time. Its performance was evaluated in a clinical setting.
METHODS: Radio frequency data were acquired from 13 patients with thyroid nodules and from 4 normal thyroids, along with reference phantom data. Scatterer size was deduced by measuring the backscatter versus frequency and fitting data to a model. Strain was obtained by a cross-correlation method, comparing precompression and postcompression radio frequency signals. Scatterer size contrast was defined as the observed contrast between the "normal" and "abnormal" tissue in the same gland or, when considering diffuse conditions, by comparing with normal values. Strain contrast was estimated if abnormal and normal tissue was captured in the same palpation, that is, excluding diffuse disease, which was the case for 9 subjects.
RESULTS: On scatterer size images, 4 nodules exhibited positive contrast versus the adjacent normal parenchyma, indicating larger scatterers. Five nodules were isoechoic, and 4 had negative contrast. Four nodules exhibited positive strain contrast, indicating that they were softer than the normal parenchyma. Two nodules had the same brightness, and 3 were darker than the background thyroid tissue on strain images.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast was observed between nodules and thyroid parenchymal tissue for both types of parametric images. Further work is needed to determine whether the diagnostic importance of these parameters in characterizing thyroid nodules might be worthwhile. Both modes must be of a sufficient frame rate to provide real-time feedback to operators, which will require further work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870895     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.8.1021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Eenas A Omari; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen; Gary Frank
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Prospective evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse technology in the differentiation of thyroid nodules: accuracy and interobserver variability assessment.

Authors:  Hektor Grazhdani; Vito Cantisani; Pietro Lodise; Giorgio Di Rocco; Maria Cristina Proietto; Eloisa Fioravanti; Antonello Rubini; Adriano Redler
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01-09

3.  Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Goutam Ghoshal; Alexander D Pawlicki; Ernest L Madsen; Roberto J Lavarello; Michael L Oelze; James A Zagzebski; William D O'Brien; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Frequency Domain Analysis of Multiwavelength Photoacoustic Signals for Differentiating Among Malignant, Benign, and Normal Thyroids in an Ex Vivo Study With Human Thyroids.

Authors:  Saugata Sinha; Vikram S Dogra; Bhargava K Chinni; Navalgund A Rao
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Timothy J Hall; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Alexander D Pawlicki; Viksit Kumar; Ernest L Madsen; Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Michael L Oelze; Timothy A Bigelow; James A Zagzebski; William D O'Brien; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.

Authors:  W Liu; J A Zagzebski; T J Hall; E L Madsen; T Varghese; M A Kliewer; S Panda; C Lowery; S Barnes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Characterization of thyroid cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; William R Ridgway; Sandhya S Sarwate; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.