Literature DB >> 29907932

Understanding the impact of advanced PET reconstruction in cardiac PET: The devil is in the details.

Ian S Armstrong1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29907932     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-018-1329-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Ludovic Le Meunier; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Amit Ramesh; Louis E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Victor Cheng; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart?

Authors:  R Glenn Wells; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Assessing time-of-flight signal-to-noise ratio gains within the myocardium and subsequent reductions in administered activity in cardiac PET studies.

Authors:  Ian S Armstrong; Christine M Tonge; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Impact of Time-of-Flight Reconstruction on Cardiac PET Images of Obese Patients.

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Richard C Brunken
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Cristina Lois; Bjoern W Jakoby; Misty J Long; Karl F Hubner; David W Barker; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Vladimir Y Panin; Dan J Kadrmas; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients.

Authors:  Paul K R Dasari; Judson P Jones; Michael E Casey; Yuanyuan Liang; Vasken Dilsizian; Mark F Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Evaluation of noise equivalent count parameters as indicators of adult whole-body FDG-PET image quality.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Fahmid U Chowdhury; Andrew F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.668

10.  Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.

Authors:  Go Akamatsu; Kaori Ishikawa; Katsuhiko Mitsumoto; Takafumi Taniguchi; Nobuyoshi Ohya; Shingo Baba; Koichiro Abe; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 10.057
View more
  1 in total

1.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.952
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.