Literature DB >> 2401075

Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery.

H Baumgartner1, S Khan, M DeRobertis, L Czer, G Maurer.   

Abstract

To evaluate possible causes of discrepancy between Doppler and catheter gradients across prosthetic valves, five sizes (19-27 mm) of St. Jude and Hancock valves were studied in an aortic pulsatile flow model. Catheter gradients at multiple sites distal to the valve were compared with simultaneously obtained Doppler gradients. In the St. Jude valve, significant differences between Doppler and catheter gradients measured 30 mm downstream from the valve were found: Doppler gradients exceeded peak catheter gradients of 10 mm Hg or more by 81 +/- 35% (15 +/- 3.6 mm Hg), and mean catheter gradients by 71 +/- 11% (10.3 +/- 2.5 mm Hg). When the catheter was pulled back through the tunnel-like central orifice of the valve, high localized gradients at the valve plane and significant early pressure recovery were found. When the catheter was pulled back through the large side orifices, gradients at the same level were only 46 +/- 6% of the central orifice gradients (mean difference, 7.6 +/- 4.5 mm Hg). Doppler peak and mean gradients showed excellent agreement with the highest central orifice catheter gradients (mean difference, 1.0 +/- 3.1 and 0.9 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, respectively). A significantly better agreement between Doppler and catheter gradients at 30 mm was found for the Hancock valve, although Doppler peak and mean gradients were still slightly greater than catheter gradients. Doppler gradients exceeded catheter gradients by 18 +/- 10% (3.4 +/- 1.9 mm Hg) and 13 +/- 11% (2.1 +/- 0.9 mm Hg), respectively. When the catheter was pulled back through the valve, the highest gradients were found approximately 20 mm distal to the valve ring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2401075     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

1.  [Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve].

Authors:  T Shimabukuro; Y Takeuchi; A Gomi; H Nakatani; Y Suda; K Kono; N Nagano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12

2.  Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?

Authors:  J Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Stenotic lesions.

Authors:  B Wranne; H Baumgartner; F Flachskampf; M Hasenkam; F Pinto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.

Authors:  R S Heinrich; A A Fontaine; R Y Grimes; A Sidhaye; S Yang; K E Moore; R A Levine; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Marked discrepancy in pressure gradient between Doppler and catheter examinations on Medtronic Mosaic valve in aortic position.

Authors:  Toshiaki Ito; Atsuo Maekawa; Genyo Fujii; Sadanari Sawaki; Satoshi Hoshino; Yasunari Hayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-06-12

6.  A multilayered valve leaflet promotes cell-laden collagen type I production and aortic valve hemodynamics.

Authors:  Aline L Y Nachlas; Siyi Li; Benjamin W Streeter; Kenneth J De Jesus Morales; Fatiesa Sulejmani; David Immanuel Madukauwa-David; Donald Bejleri; Wei Sun; Ajit P Yoganathan; Michael E Davis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tanabe
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-08-19

8.  Left ventricular dynamics after aortic valve replacement: a long-term, combined radionuclide angiographic and ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  C S Masotti; P Bonfranceschi; G Rusticali; F Rusticali; A Pierangeli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1992

9.  Comparison of Doppler derived haemodynamic variables and simultaneous high fidelity pressure measurements in severe pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  S J Brecker; J S Gibbs; K M Fox; M H Yacoub; D G Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-10

10.  Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in ventricular septal defect: a correction of localized gradients from pressure recovery phenomenon.

Authors:  Taylan Akgun; Can Yücel Karabay; Gonenc Kocabay; Vecih Oduncu; Arzu Kalayci; Ahmet Guler; Olcay Ozveren; Fatih Yilmaz; Mustafa Akcakoyun; Cevat Kirma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.