Literature DB >> 8944578

Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?

J Chambers.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8944578      PMCID： PMC484563          DOI： 10.1136/hrt.76.5.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN： 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis--I. Theory and steady flow experiments.

Authors:  C Clark
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with a non-invasive ultrasound Doppler technique.

Authors:  J Holen; R Aaslid; K Landmark; S Simonsen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1976

3.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques.

Authors:  A P Yoganathan; E G Cape; H W Sung; F P Williams; A Jimoh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Doppler ultrasound in aortic stenosis: in vitro studies of pressure gradient determination.

Authors:  J Holen; R C Waag; R Gramiak
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  R A Levine; A Jimoh; E G Cape; S McMillan; A P Yoganathan; A E Weyman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position.

Authors:  P M Vandervoort; N L Greenberg; K A Powell; D M Cosgrove; J D Thomas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Evaluation in vitro of prosthetic heart valves: pulsatile flow through a compliant aorta.

Authors:  W B Tindale; E A Trowbridge
Journal:  Life Support Syst       Date:  1983 Jul-Sep

8.  A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J Krafchek; J H Robertson; M Radford; D Adams; J Kisslo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Factors affecting accuracy of in vitro valvar pressure gradient estimates by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  S D Vasko; S J Goldberg; J A Requarth; H D Allen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

Authors:  P J Currie; J B Seward; G S Reeder; R E Vlietstra; D R Bresnahan; J F Bresnahan; H C Smith; D J Hagler; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 29.690
View more
  2 in total

1.  Discrepancy between catheter and doppler gradients immediately post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an underexpanded prosthesis.

Authors:  Imad Hameedullah; Elnazeer O Ahmed; Abdalla Alzoobiy; Osama Elkhateeb
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-04-22

2.  Non-invasive determination of pressure recovery by cardiac MRI and echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: short and long-term outcome prediction.

Authors:  Florian Sagmeister; Sebastian Herrmann; Tobias Gassenmaier; Peter Bernhardt; Volker Rasche; Andreas Liebold; Frank Weidemann; Horst Brunner; Meinrad Beer
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.