Literature DB >> 7833199

Comparison of Doppler derived haemodynamic variables and simultaneous high fidelity pressure measurements in severe pulmonary hypertension.

S J Brecker1, J S Gibbs, K M Fox, M H Yacoub, D G Gibson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess relations between right ventricular pressure measured with a high fidelity transducer tipped catheter and the characteristics of tricuspid regurgitation recorded with Doppler echocardiography.
DESIGN: A prospective non-randomised study of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension referred for consideration of lung transplantation.
SETTING: A tertiary referral centre for cardiac and pulmonary disease, with facilities for invasive and non-invasive investigation, and assessment for heart and heart-lung transplantation. PATIENTS: 10 patients with severe pulmonary hypertension being considered for lung transplantation. ENDPOINTS: Peak right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and right atrial pressures; peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt; peak Doppler right ventricular-right atrial pressure drop; Doppler derived peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt; and time intervals of Q to peak right ventricular pressure and to peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 109 (29) mm Hg. The peak Doppler right ventricular-right atrial pressure drop underestimated peak right ventricular pressure by 38 (21) mm Hg, and by 21 (18) mm Hg when the Doppler value was added to the measured right atrial pressure (P values < 0.05). This discrepancy was greater for higher pulmonary artery pressures. The timing of peak right ventricular pressure differed, with the Doppler value consistently shorter (mean difference 16 ms, P < 0.05). Values of peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt and the time intervals Q-peak positive right ventricular dP/dt and pulmonary closure to the end of the pressure pulse differed between the two techniques in individual patients, but not in a consistent or predictable way.
CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography significantly underestimates the peak right ventricular pressure and the time interval to peak right ventricular pressure in pulmonary hypertension, particularly when severe. These differences may be related to orifice geometry. Digitisation of Doppler records of tricuspid regurgitation provides useful semiquantitative estimates of absolute values and timing of peak positive and negative right ventricular dP/dt. Clinically significant differences may exist, however, and must be considered in individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7833199      PMCID: PMC1025552          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.72.4.384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  16 in total

1.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques.

Authors:  A P Yoganathan; E G Cape; H W Sung; F P Williams; A Jimoh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states.

Authors:  J Segal; D J Lerner; D C Miller; R S Mitchell; E A Alderman; R L Popp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Noninvasive estimation of systolic pressure in the right ventricle in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  T Skjaerpe; L Hatle
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  The effect of chronic pulmonary hypertension on left ventricular size, function, and interventricular septal motion.

Authors:  M Jessup; M S Sutton; K T Weber; J S Janicki
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  P G Yock; R L Popp
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of impaired left ventricular filling in patients with right ventricular pressure overload due to primary pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  E K Louie; S Rich; B H Brundage
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure during exercise by saline-enhanced Doppler echocardiography in chronic pulmonary disease.

Authors:  R B Himelman; M Stulbarg; B Kircher; E Lee; L Kee; N C Dean; J Golden; C L Wolfe; N B Schiller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Unpredictable zero drift in intravascular micromanometer tipped catheters during long term pulmonary artery pressure recording: implications for catheter design.

Authors:  J S Gibbs; D Cunningham; J Sparrow; P A Poole-Wilson; K M Fox
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.787

10.  Effects of abnormal activation on the time course of the left ventricular pressure pulse in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  H B Xiao; S J Brecker; D G Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-10
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Tricuspid regurgitation: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Rashmi Thapa; Buddhadeb Dawn; Jayant Nath
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Validation of high-resolution echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging vs. high-fidelity catheterization in experimental pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Dalia Urboniene; Idith Haber; Yong-Hu Fang; Thenappan Thenappan; Stephen L Archer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.464

3.  Pulmonary artery pressure variation in patients with connective tissue disease: 24 hour ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure monitoring.

Authors:  D A Raeside; G Chalmers; J Clelland; R Madhok; A J Peacock
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Submaximal heart and pulmonary evaluation: a novel noninvasive test to identify pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Elana J Bernstein; Lisa A Mandl; Jessica K Gordon; Robert F Spiera; Evelyn M Horn
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Pulmonary hypertension in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Authors:  Dirk S Koschel; Carlos Cardoso; Bärbel Wiedemann; Gert Höffken; Michael Halank
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.584

6.  Accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressures in a canine model of pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Lydia C Soydan; Heidi B Kellihan; Melissa L Bates; Rebecca L Stepien; Daniel W Consigny; Alessandro Bellofiore; Christopher J Francois; Naomi C Chesler
Journal:  J Vet Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.701

Review 7.  Pulmonary hypertension caused by sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Enrique Diaz-Guzman; Carol Farver; Joseph Parambil; Daniel A Culver
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.878

8.  Age-associated increases in pulmonary artery systolic pressure in the general population.

Authors:  Carolyn S P Lam; Barry A Borlaug; Garvan C Kane; Felicity T Enders; Richard J Rodeheffer; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Right ventricular thickness as predictor of global myocardial performance in systemic sclerosis: A Doppler tissue imaging study.

Authors:  S K Karna; M K Rohit; A Wanchu
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

10.  Early right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis without pulmonary hypertension: a Doppler Tissue and Speckle Tracking echocardiography study.

Authors:  Sebastian Schattke; Fabian Knebel; Andrea Grohmann; Henryk Dreger; Friederike Kmezik; Gabriela Riemekasten; Gert Baumann; Adrian C Borges
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.