PURPOSE: This study develops a method to obtain optimal estimates of absolute magnetization phase from multiple-coil MRI data. THEORY AND METHODS: The element-specific phases of a multi-element receiver coil array are accounted for by using the phase of a real or virtual reference coil that is sensitive over the entire imaged volume. The virtual-reference coil is generated as a weighted combination of measurements from all receiver coils. The phase-corrected multiple coil complex images are combined using the inverse covariance matrix. These methods are tested on images of an agar phantom, an in vivo breast, and an anesthetized rabbit obtained using combinations of four, nine, and three receiver channels, respectively. RESULTS: The four- and three-channel acquisitions require formation of a virtual-reference receiver coil while one channel of the nine-channel receive array has a sensitivity profile covering the entire imaged volume. Referencing to a real or virtual coil gives receiver phases that are essentially identical except for the individual receiver channel noise. The resulting combined images, which account for receiver channel noise covariance, show the expected reduction in phase variance. CONCLUSION: The proposed virtual reference coil method determines a phase distribution for each coil from which an optimal phase map can be obtained.
PURPOSE: This study develops a method to obtain optimal estimates of absolute magnetization phase from multiple-coil MRI data. THEORY AND METHODS: The element-specific phases of a multi-element receiver coil array are accounted for by using the phase of a real or virtual reference coil that is sensitive over the entire imaged volume. The virtual-reference coil is generated as a weighted combination of measurements from all receiver coils. The phase-corrected multiple coil complex images are combined using the inverse covariance matrix. These methods are tested on images of an agar phantom, an in vivo breast, and an anesthetized rabbit obtained using combinations of four, nine, and three receiver channels, respectively. RESULTS: The four- and three-channel acquisitions require formation of a virtual-reference receiver coil while one channel of the nine-channel receive array has a sensitivity profile covering the entire imaged volume. Referencing to a real or virtual coil gives receiver phases that are essentially identical except for the individual receiver channel noise. The resulting combined images, which account for receiver channel noise covariance, show the expected reduction in phase variance. CONCLUSION: The proposed virtual reference coil method determines a phase distribution for each coil from which an optimal phase map can be obtained.
Authors: Deniz Erdogmus; Rui Yan; Erik G Larsson; Jose C Principe; Jeffrey R Fitzsimmons Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Thomas J Vogl; Frank Huebner; Nagy N N Naguib; Ralf W Bauer; Martin G Mack; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Dirk Meister Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Sébastien Roujol; Pierre Jaïs; Chrit T W Moonen; Gwenaël Herigault; Bruno Quesson Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Steven Kecskemeti; Kevin Johnson; Yijing Wu; Charles Mistretta; Patrick Turski; Oliver Wieben Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kathryn E Hammond; Janine M Lupo; Duan Xu; Meredith Metcalf; Douglas A C Kelley; Daniel Pelletier; Susan M Chang; Pratik Mukherjee; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lorne W Hofstetter; Henrik Odéen; Bradley D Bolster; Alexander Mueller; Douglas A Christensen; Allison Payne; Dennis L Parker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Siegfried Trattnig; Elisabeth Springer; Wolfgang Bogner; Gilbert Hangel; Bernhard Strasser; Barbara Dymerska; Pedro Lima Cardoso; Simon Daniel Robinson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-11-13 Impact factor: 6.556