Literature DB >> 30663806

Efficient shear wave elastography using transient acoustic radiation force excitations and MR displacement encoding.

Lorne W Hofstetter1, Henrik Odéen1, Bradley D Bolster2, Alexander Mueller1, Douglas A Christensen3,4, Allison Payne1, Dennis L Parker1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a novel MR shear wave elastography (MR-SWE) method that efficiently measures the speed of propagating wave packets generated using acoustic radiation force (ARF) impulses.
METHODS: ARF impulses from a focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer were applied sequentially to a preselected set of positions and motion encoded MRI was used to acquire volumetric images of the propagating shear wavefront emanating from each point. The wavefront position at multiple propagation times was encoded in the MR phase image using a train of motion encoding gradient lobes. Generating a transient propagating wavefront at multiple spatial positions and sampling each at multiple time-points allowed for shear wave speed maps to be efficiently created. MR-SWE was evaluated in tissue mimicking phantoms and ex vivo bovine liver tissue before and after ablation.
RESULTS: MR-SWE maps, covering an in-plane area of ~5 × 5 cm, were acquired in 12 s for a single slice and 144 s for a volumetric scan. MR-SWE detected inclusions of differing stiffness in a phantom experiment. In bovine liver, mean shear wave speed significantly increased from 1.65 ± 0.18 m/s in normal to 2.52 ± 0.18 m/s in ablated region (n = 581 pixels; P-value < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: MR-SWE is an elastography technique that enables precise targeting and excitation of the desired tissue of interest. MR-SWE may be particularly well suited for treatment planning and endpoint assessment of MR-guided FUS procedures because the same device used for therapy can be used as an excitation source for tissue stiffness quantification.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARFI; MRE; acoustic radiation force; elastography; shear wave speed

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30663806      PMCID: PMC6414262          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  43 in total

1.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Paul J McCracken; Armando Manduca; Joel Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasibility study.

Authors:  Marie Muller; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thomas Deffieux; Mickaël Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  A simulation technique for 3D MR-guided acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Allison Payne; Josh de Bever; Alexis Farrer; Brittany Coats; Dennis L Parker; Douglas A Christensen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; D J Lomas; P J Rossman; J F Greenleaf; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift.

Authors:  Y Ishihara; A Calderon; H Watanabe; K Okamoto; Y Suzuki; K Kuroda; Y Suzuki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: comparison of Supersonic Shear Imaging with ARFI and FibroScan®.

Authors:  Christophe Cassinotto; Bruno Lapuyade; Amaury Mouries; Jean-Baptiste Hiriart; Julien Vergniol; Delphine Gaye; Claire Castain; Brigitte Le Bail; Faiza Chermak; Juliette Foucher; François Laurent; Michel Montaudon; Victor De Ledinghen
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels?

Authors:  Gerard C van Rhoon; Theodoros Samaras; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Mark W Dewhirst; Esra Neufeld; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Characterization and evaluation of tissue-mimicking gelatin phantoms for use with MRgFUS.

Authors:  Alexis I Farrer; Henrik Odéen; Joshua de Bever; Brittany Coats; Dennis L Parker; Allison Payne; Douglas A Christensen
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving in situ acoustic intensity estimates using MR acoustic radiation force imaging in combination with multifrequency MR elastography.

Authors:  Ningrui Li; Pooja Gaur; Kristin Quah; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Magnetic resonance shear wave elastography using transient acoustic radiation force excitations and sinusoidal displacement encoding.

Authors:  Lorne W Hofstetter; Henrik Odéen; Bradley D Bolster; Douglas A Christensen; Allison Payne; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.