Qian Zheng1, Lin Xu2, Liang Xiong2, Xiao Cui1, Jiaofen Nan1, Taigang He3,4. 1. Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China. 2. Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China. 3. Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 4. St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The combination of multi-channel data is a critical step for the imaging of phase and susceptibility contrast in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Magnitude-weighted phase combination methods often produce noise and aliasing artifacts in the magnitude images at accelerated imaging sceneries. To address this issue, an optimal coil combination method through deconvolution in k-space is proposed in this paper. METHODS: The proposed method firstly employs the sum-of-squares and phase aligning method to yield a complex reference coil image which is then used to calculate the coil sensitivity and its Fourier transform. Then, the coil k-space combining weights is computed, taking into account the truncated frequency data of coil sensitivity and the acquired k-space data. Finally, combining the coil k-space data with the acquired weights generates the k-space data of proton distribution, with which both phase and magnitude information can be obtained straightforwardly. Both phantom and in vivo imaging experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. RESULTS: Compared with magnitude-weighted method and MCPC-C, the proposed method can alleviate the phase cancellation in coil combination, resulting in a less wrapped phase. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method provides an effective and efficient approach to combine multiple coil image in parallel MRI reconstruction, and has potential to benefit routine clinical practice in the future. 2019 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The combination of multi-channel data is a critical step for the imaging of phase and susceptibility contrast in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Magnitude-weighted phase combination methods often produce noise and aliasing artifacts in the magnitude images at accelerated imaging sceneries. To address this issue, an optimal coil combination method through deconvolution in k-space is proposed in this paper. METHODS: The proposed method firstly employs the sum-of-squares and phase aligning method to yield a complex reference coil image which is then used to calculate the coil sensitivity and its Fourier transform. Then, the coil k-space combining weights is computed, taking into account the truncated frequency data of coil sensitivity and the acquired k-space data. Finally, combining the coil k-space data with the acquired weights generates the k-space data of proton distribution, with which both phase and magnitude information can be obtained straightforwardly. Both phantom and in vivo imaging experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. RESULTS: Compared with magnitude-weighted method and MCPC-C, the proposed method can alleviate the phase cancellation in coil combination, resulting in a less wrapped phase. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method provides an effective and efficient approach to combine multiple coil image in parallel MRI reconstruction, and has potential to benefit routine clinical practice in the future. 2019 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Phase; coil combination; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); phase unwrapping
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Michael Markl; Alex Frydrychowicz; Sebastian Kozerke; Mike Hope; Oliver Wieben Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kathryn E Hammond; Janine M Lupo; Duan Xu; Meredith Metcalf; Douglas A C Kelley; Daniel Pelletier; Susan M Chang; Pratik Mukherjee; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Philip J Beatty; Shaorong Chang; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Anja C S Brau; Scott B Reeder; Jean H Brittain Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Simon Daniel Robinson; Kristian Bredies; Diana Khabipova; Barbara Dymerska; José P Marques; Ferdinand Schweser Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Brianna F Moon; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; Nicholas J Josselyn; Eileen Hwuang; Sophia Swago; Samuel J Keeney; Estibaliz Castillero; Giovanni Ferrari; James J Pilla; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Cory M Tschabrunn; Haochang Shou; William Matthai; Felix W Wehrli; Victor A Ferrari; Yuchi Han; Harold Litt; Walter R Witschey Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 3.737