Literature DB >> 23991272

The dynforce archwire.

Daniele Cantarella1, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani.   

Abstract

This article is a presentation of a clinical methodology aimed at minimizing binding in fixed orthodontic appliances. The dynforce archwire is explained. The dynforce archwire has a full size anterior segment (e.g. .021×.025) and undersized posterior segments with rectangular cross-section (e.g. .018×.025 or .018×.022), and is used in the orthodontic phase of space closure with or without TAD miniscrews. Two clinical cases are presented.

Keywords:  TAD; archwire; binding; ceramic brackets; friction; incisor; miniscrew; retraction; skeletal anchorage; sliding; torque

Year:  2013        PMID： 23991272      PMCID： PMC3755796     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)        ISSN： 1824-0852


  12 in total

1.  Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states: influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement.

Authors:  R P Kusy; J Q Whitley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-12-15

Review 2.  Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium.

Authors:  R P Kusy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.

Authors:  Glenys A Thorstenson; Robert P Kusy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review.

Authors:  S Jack Burrow
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Dr. William Proffit on the present and future of orthodontics. Interview by Sarah Shoaf.

Authors:  William Proffit
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2008-12

6.  Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.

Authors:  Glenys A Thorstenson; Robert P Kusy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances.

Authors:  L C Articolo; R P Kusy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  A comparison of force decay: elastic chain or tie-back method?

Authors:  Morteza Oshagh; Shabnam Ajami
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2010

9.  Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance.

Authors:  M M Moore; E Harrington; W P Rock
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire.

Authors:  C A Frank; R J Nikolai
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating.

Authors:  Aurel-Claudiu Vartolomei; Dan-Cosmin Serbanoiu; Dana-Valentina Ghiga; Marioara Moldovan; Stanca Cuc; Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann; Mariana Pacurar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Stiffness comparison of mushroom and straight SS and TMA lingual archwires.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Antonella Carlucci; Mario Palone; Francesco Mollica; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.750

3.  Comparison of dual-dimensional and rectangular wires in terms of space closure and anchorage loss during retraction with miniimplants: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Sangeetha Morekonda Gnaneswar; Premkumar Sridhar
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2020

4.  Dual-section versus conventional archwire for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth with direct skeletal anchorage: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ryo Hamanaka; Daniele Cantarella; Luca Lombardo; Lorena Karanxha; Massimo Del Fabbro; Giuseppe Siciliani; Noriaki Yoshida
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.757
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.