Literature DB >> 12226612

Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.

Glenys A Thorstenson1, Robert P Kusy.   

Abstract

When paired with a particular self-ligating bracket design, the material and the geometric characteristics of an archwire influence its resistance to sliding. Four designs of self-ligating brackets (1 with a slide, 3 with clips) were coupled with 5 types of archwires: 14-mil round austenitic nickel-titanium, 16 x 22-mil rectangular austenitic nickel-titanium, 19 x 25-mil rectangular austenitic nickel-titanium, 19 x 25-mil rectangular martensitic nickel-titanium, and 19 x 25-mil rectangular stainless steel. The resistance to sliding (RS) of each archwire-bracket couple was measured at second-order angles between -9 degrees and 9 degrees. Interbracket distances of 8 and 18 mm between the test bracket and the adjacent brackets mimicked closure of a premolar extraction. When clearance exists, the RS is negligible for self-ligating brackets with slides coupled to any size of wire as well as for those with clips when coupled to wires that do not contact the clip. Once the wire attains a certain size and contacts the clip, the RS depends on the archwire size, the bracket design, and the materials of the couple. When coupled with the 16 x 22-mil wire, the brackets with clips applied normal forces ranging from a low of 5.6 centi-Newtons (cN) (1 cN = 1 g) to a high of 230 cN. When clearance disappears, the RS increased proportionally with the second-order angle. The 19 x 25-mil stainless steel wires, which were the most stiff, increased at rates between 75 and 84 cN/degree; the 14-mil austenitic nickel-titanium wires, which were the least stiff, increased at rates from 2.6 to 5.4 cN/degree. The treatment objectives for a particular patient at a specific stage should determine the appropriate archwire-bracket combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226612     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  27 in total

1.  Self-ligating versus Invisalign: analysis of dento-alveolar effects.

Authors:  Chiara Pavoni; Roberta Lione; Giuseppina Laganà; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-07-18

2.  A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type.

Authors:  Souk Min Lee; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  The dynforce archwire.

Authors:  Daniele Cantarella; Luca Lombardo; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2013-06-25

4.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

5.  Friction coefficients and wear rates of different orthodontic archwires in artificial saliva.

Authors:  M V Alfonso; E Espinar; J M Llamas; E Rupérez; J M Manero; J M Barrera; E Solano; F J Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Graziane Olímpio Pereira; Carla Maria Melleiro Gimenez; Lucas Prieto; Marcos Gabriel do Lago Prieto; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

7.  Relationship between friction force and orthodontic force at the leveling stage using a coated wire.

Authors:  Masaki Murayama; Yasuhiro Namura; Takahiko Tamura; Hiroaki Iwai; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.

Authors:  S Jack Burrow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Active and passive self-ligation-a myth?

Authors:  Lorenz M Brauchli; Christiane Senn; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.