Literature DB >> 11033563

Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states: influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement.

R P Kusy1, J Q Whitley.   

Abstract

Having established dimensional and mechanical characteristics, the resistances to sliding (RS) were measured in vitro for various archwires against stainless steel brackets. Using stainless steel ligatures, a constant normal force (300g) was maintained while second-order angulation (straight theta) was varied from -12 degrees to +12 degrees. Using miniature bearings to simulate contiguous teeth, five experiments each were run in the dry or wet states with human saliva at 34 degrees C as a function of four archwire alloys, five interbracket distances, and two bracket engagements. Outcomes were objectively analyzed to establish when theta=0, and the relative contact angles ( theta(r)) were replotted. Critical contact angles (theta(c)) that were determined via experimentation were in good agreement with theory. Slopes and y-intercepts were tabulated from linear regression equations of RS against theta plots in both the passive (theta < or = theta (c)) and active ( theta > or = theta(c)) configurations, for which theta = theta(c) identified the boundary between classical friction and binding phenomena. Stiffer archwires and shorter interbracket distances exacerbated binding, whereas, once corrected for differing bracket engagement, RS was independent of slot dimension. Unlike earlier results in the passive configuration, in the active configuration couples comprised of titanium alloys (NiTi and (beta-Ti) had higher RS values in the wet versus the dry state. For those archwire alloys evaluated, two empirical expressions were adduced that comprise the binding component, the yield strength or elastic limit, and the beam length, which implicitly represent the stiffness, flexibility, and interbracket distance. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11033563     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<797::aid-jbm25>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  15 in total

1.  The dynforce archwire.

Authors:  Daniele Cantarella; Luca Lombardo; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2013-06-25

2.  The Effect of Ligature Type on Lateral Tooth Movement during Orthodontic Treatment with Lingual Appliances-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Reichardt; Steffen Decker; Michel Dalstra; Prasad Nalabothu; Markus Steineck; Leandro Fernandez; Carlalberta Verna
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Relationship between friction force and orthodontic force at the leveling stage using a coated wire.

Authors:  Masaki Murayama; Yasuhiro Namura; Takahiko Tamura; Hiroaki Iwai; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Debris, roughness and friction of stainless steel archwires following clinical use.

Authors:  Isabella Silva Vieira Marques; Adriana M Araújo; Júlio A Gurgel; David Normando
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of bracket design on critical contact angle.

Authors:  Xiaomo Liu; Peng Ding; Jiuxiang Lin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Paolo M Cattaneo; Raaid A Salih; Birte Melsen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva--an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo; Matheus Melo Pithon; José Vinicius Bolognesi Maciel; Ana Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  A new esthetic fiber-reinforced polymer composite resin archwire: a comparative atomic force microscope (AFM) and field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) study.

Authors:  Chai Kiat Chng; Kelvin Foong; Narayan H Gandedkar; Yiong Huak Chan; Chong-Lin Chew
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Effect of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors on frictional resistance.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Tzer-Min Lee; Jia-Kuang Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Weronika Wierusz; Dominique Toscano; Roberto Lapenta; Andrea Kaplan; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.