Literature DB >> 19361729

Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review.

S Jack Burrow1.   

Abstract

Despite the emphasis it now receives in the marketing of self-ligating brackets, friction is not the major component of resistance to sliding in clinical treatment. Laboratory studies show that binding of the wire against the corners of the bracket, which occurs soon after tooth movement begins, is much more important than previously thought, and that notching of the archwire, which temporarily stops movement, can occur. Clinical studies support the view that resistance to bodily tooth movement by sliding has little to do with friction and, instead, is largely a binding-and-release phenomenon that is about the same with conventional and self-ligating brackets. The limited clinical trial data available now do not support the contention that treatment time is reduced (presumably because of lower friction) with self-ligating brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19361729     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  53 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Pankaj Juneja; G Shivaprakash; S S Chopra; P B Kambalyal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-04-03

2.  The dynforce archwire.

Authors:  Daniele Cantarella; Luca Lombardo; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2013-06-25

3.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  [Comparison of friction force between Lock-loose bracket and traditional bracket].

Authors:  Liu Xiaowei; Yang Luyi; Zhu Huifang; Dong Yan; Wang Qi; Jiang Wei; Wu Yanran
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-12

5.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

6.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.

Authors:  Vanessa Vieira Leite; Murilo Baena Lopes; Alcides Gonini Júnior; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Sandra Kiss Moura; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

8.  Comparison of frictional forces between aesthetic orthodontic coated wires and self-ligation brackets.

Authors:  Yunmi Kim; Jung-Yul Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang; Hyung Seog Yu; Seon Gun Tahk
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires covered with a polyether ether ketone tube.

Authors:  Nobukazu Shirakawa; Toshio Iwata; Shinjiro Miyake; Takero Otuka; So Koizumi; Toshitugu Kawata
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Friction behavior and other material properties of nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum archwires following electrochemical surface refinement.

Authors:  Miriam Julia Meier; Christoph Bourauel; Jan Roehlike; Susanne Reimann; Ludger Keilig; Bert Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.