Literature DB >> 2398326

Matching, delay-reduction, and maximizing models for choice in concurrent-chains schedules.

J E Luco1.   

Abstract

Models of choice in concurrent-chains schedules are derived from melioration, generalized matching, and optimization. The resulting models are compared with those based on Fantino's (1969, 1981) delay-reduction hypothesis. It is found that all models involve the delay reduction factors (T - t2L) and (T - t2R), where T is the expected time to primary reinforcement and t2L, t2R are the durations of the terminal links. In particular, in the case of equal initial links, the model derived from melioration coincides with Fantino's original model for full (reliable) reinforcement and with the model proposed by Spetch and Dunn (1987) for percentage (unreliable) reinforcement. In the general case of unequal initial links, the model derived from melioration differs from the revised model advanced by Squires and Fantino (1971) only in the factors affecting the delay-reduction terms (T - t2L) and (T - t2R). The models of choice obtained by minimizing the expected time to reinforcement depend on the type of feedback functions used. In particular, if power feedback functions are used, the optimization model coincides with that obtained from melioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2398326      PMCID: PMC1322946          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice: Some quantitative relations.

Authors:  E Fantino; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A molar theory of reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  N Squires; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.

Authors:  M L Spetch; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Immediacy versus anticipated delay in the time-left experiment: a test of the cognitive hypothesis.

Authors:  D T Cerutti; J E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-01

2.  Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.

Authors:  R A Preston; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.

Authors:  U Stockhorst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Delay reduction: current status.

Authors:  E Fantino; R A Preston; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice, conditioned reinforcement, and the prius effect.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

8.  Choice in the time-left procedure and in concurrent chains with a time-left terminal link.

Authors:  R A Preston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.