Literature DB >> 2037825

Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.

R A Preston1, E Fantino.   

Abstract

The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement states that the reinforcing value of a food-associated stimulus is determined by the delay to primary reinforcement signaled by the onset of the stimulus relative to the average delay to primary reinforcement in the conditioning situation. In contrast, most contemporary models of conditioned reinforcement strength posit that the reinforcing strength of a stimulus is some simple function only of the delay to primary reinforcement in the presence of stimulus. The delay-reduction hypothesis diverges from other conditioned reinforcement models in that it predicts that a fixed-duration food-paired stimulus will have different reinforcing values depending on the frequency of its presentation. In Experiment 1, pigeons' key pecks were reinforced according to concurrent-chains schedules with variable-interval 10-second and variable-interval 20-second terminal-link schedules. The initial-link schedule preceding the shorter terminal link was always variable-interval 60 seconds, and the initial-link schedule requirement preceding the longer terminal link was varied between 1 second and 60 seconds across conditions. In Experiment 2, the initial-link schedule preceding the longer of two terminal links was varied for each of three groups of pigeons. The terminal links of the concurrent chains for the three groups were variable-interval 10 seconds and 20 seconds, variable-interval 10 seconds and 30 seconds, and variable-interval 30 seconds and 50 seconds. In both experiments, preference for the shorter terminal link was either a bitonic function or an inverse function of the initial-link schedule preceding the longer terminal-link schedule. Consistent with the predictions of the delay-reduction hypothesis, the relative values of the terminal-link stimuli changed as a function of the overall frequency of primary reinforcement. Vaughan's (1985) melioration model, which was shown to be formally similar to Squires and Fantino's (1971) delay-reduction model, can be modified so as to predict these results without changing its underlying assumptions.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037825      PMCID: PMC1323052          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  SEPARATION OF THE SALIVARY AND MOTOR RESPONSES IN INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING.

Authors:  G D ELLISON; J KONORSKI
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice: Some quantitative relations.

Authors:  E Fantino; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.

Authors:  J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model.

Authors:  M C Davison; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of conditioned anxiety.

Authors:  P A De Villiers; J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.

Authors:  B O Ploog
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Temporal context in concurrent chains: I. Terminal-link duration.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994

4.  Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino; D Freed; R A Preston; W A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.

Authors:  W A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

9.  Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.

Authors:  U Stockhorst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice in the time-left procedure and in concurrent chains with a time-left terminal link.

Authors:  R A Preston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.