Literature DB >> 29134475

Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.

James D Lewis1.   

Abstract

Detection of medial olivocochlear-induced (MOC) changes to transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) requires high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). TEOAEs associated with synchronized spontaneous (SS) OAEs exhibit higher SNRs than TEOAEs in the absence of SSOAEs, potentially making the former well suited for MOC assays. Although SSOAEs may complicate interpretation of MOC-induced changes to TEOAE latency, recent work suggests SSOAEs are not a problem in non-latency-dependent MOC assays. The current work examined the potential benefit of SSOAEs in TEOAE-based assays of the MOC efferents. It was hypothesized that the higher SNR afforded by SSOAEs would permit detection of smaller changes to the TEOAE upon activation of the MOC reflex. TEOAEs were measured in 24 female subjects in the presence and absence of contralateral broadband noise. Frequency bands with and without SSOAEs were identified for each subject. The prevalence of TEOAEs and statistically significant MOC effects were highest in frequency bands that also contained SSOAEs. The median TEOAE SNR in frequency bands with SSOAEs was approximately 8 dB higher than the SNR in frequency bands lacking SSOAEs. After normalizing by TEOAE amplitude, MOC-induced changes to the TEOAE were similar between frequency bands with and without SSOAEs. Smaller MOC effects were detectable across a subset of the frequency bands with SSOAEs, presumably due to a higher TEOAE SNR. These findings demonstrate that SSOAEs are advantageous in assays of the MOC reflex.

Keywords:  auditory efferent system; cochlear processing; female; normal hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134475      PMCID: PMC5783927          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0645-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  44 in total

1.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Ian B Mertes; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effect of subject task on contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Influence of medial olivocochlear efferents on the sharpness of cochlear tuning estimates in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Zoë Dinger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.

Authors:  J B Mott; S J Norton; S T Neely; W B Warr
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Auditory selective attention in the human cochlea.

Authors:  M H Giard; L Collet; P Bouchet; J Pernier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Interactions among spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Distortion products and linked emissions.

Authors:  E M Burns; E A Strickland; A Tubis; K Jones
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.

Authors:  A Moulin; L Collet; R Duclaux
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory cortex basal activity modulates cochlear responses in chinchillas.

Authors:  Alex León; Diego Elgueda; María A Silva; Carlos M Hamamé; Paul H Delano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Greater in Women than in Men.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Edyta Pilka; Malgorzata Pastucha; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-01-19

3.  Fluctuations of Otoacoustic Emissions and Medial Olivocochlear Reflexes: Tracking One Subject over a Year.

Authors:  Malgorzata Pastucha; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-09-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.