Literature DB >> 25735232

Shrinkage estimation of the genomic relationship matrix can improve genomic estimated breeding values in the training set.

Dominik Müller1, Frank Technow, Albrecht E Melchinger.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: We evaluated several methods for computing shrinkage estimates of the genomic relationship matrix and demonstrated their potential to enhance the reliability of genomic estimated breeding values of training set individuals. In genomic prediction in plant breeding, the training set constitutes a large fraction of the total number of genotypes assayed and is itself subject to selection. The objective of our study was to investigate whether genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of individuals in the training set can be enhanced by shrinkage estimation of the genomic relationship matrix. We simulated two different population types: a diversity panel of unrelated individuals and a biparental family of doubled haploid lines. For different training set sizes (50, 100, 200), number of markers (50, 100, 200, 500, 2,500) and heritabilities (0.25, 0.5, 0.75), shrinkage coefficients were computed by four different methods. Two of these methods are novel and based on measures of LD, the other two were previously described in the literature, one of which was extended by us. Our results showed that shrinkage estimation of the genomic relationship matrix can significantly improve the reliability of the GEBVs of training set individuals, especially for a low number of markers. We demonstrate that the number of markers is the primary determinant of the optimum shrinkage coefficient maximizing the reliability and we recommend methods eligible for routine usage in practical applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25735232     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2464-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  21 in total

1.  Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding.

Authors:  Ben Hayes; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.166

2.  Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Comparison of whole-genome prediction models for traits with contrasting genetic architecture in a diversity panel of maize inbred lines.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genomic assisted selection for enhancing line breeding: merging genomic and phenotypic selection in winter wheat breeding programs with preliminary yield trials.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Christian Ametz; Huseyin Gungor; Batuhan Akgöl; Doru Epure; Heinrich Grausgruber; Franziska Löschenberger; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Parent-progeny imputation from pooled samples for cost-efficient genotyping in plant breeding.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Justin Gerke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Predicting genomic selection efficiency to optimize calibration set and to assess prediction accuracy in highly structured populations.

Authors:  R Rincent; A Charcosset; L Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Metabolomics and genomics combine to unravel the pathway for the presence of fragrance in rice.

Authors:  Venea Dara Daygon; Mariafe Calingacion; Louise C Forster; James J De Voss; Brett D Schwartz; Ben Ovenden; David E Alonso; Susan R McCouch; Mary J Garson; Melissa A Fitzgerald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Numericware i: Identical by State Matrix Calculator.

Authors:  Bongsong Kim; William D Beavis
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Use of F2 Bulks in Training Sets for Genomic Prediction of Combining Ability and Hybrid Performance.

Authors:  Frank Technow
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Simultaneous selection for grain yield and protein content in genomics-assisted wheat breeding.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Franziska Löschenberger; Christian Ametz; Bernadette Pachler; Ellen Sparry; Hermann Bürstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.699

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.