Literature DB >> 23973946

New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial.

Lukas R C Dekker1, Pepijn H van der Voort, Timothy A Simmers, Xander A A M Verbeek, Roland W M Bullens, Marcel Van't Veer, Peter J M Brands, Albert Meijer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite their carcinogenic potential, X-rays remain indispensable for electrophysiologic (EP) procedures.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose reduction and image quality of a novel X-ray technology using advanced image processing and dose reduction technology in an EP laboratory.
METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, unblinded, parallel controlled trial, consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for complex arrhythmias were eligible. The Philips Allura FD20 system allows switching between the reference (Allura Xper) and the novel X-ray imaging technology (Allura Clarity). Primary end-point was overall procedural patient dose, expressed in dose area product (DAP) and air kerma (AK). Operator dose, procedural success, and necessity to switch to higher dose settings were secondary end-points.
RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were randomly assigned to the novel imaging group (n = 68) or the reference group (n = 68). Baseline characteristics were similar, except patients in the novel imaging group were younger (58 vs 65 years, P < .01). Median DAP and AK were 43% and 40% lower in the novel imaging group, respectively (P < .0001). A 50% operator dose reduction was achieved in the novel imaging group (P < .001). Fluoroscopy time, number of exposure frames, and procedure duration were equivalent between the two groups, indicating that the image quality was similarly adequate in both groups. Procedural success was achieved in 91% of patients in both groups; one pericardial tamponade occurred in the novel imaging group.
CONCLUSION: The novel imaging technology, Allura Clarity, significantly reduces patient and operator dose in complex EP procedures while maintaining image quality.
© 2013 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AF; AK; Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; BMI; DAP; Dose reduction; EP; EPD; Imaging; PVI; Pulmonary vein isolation; Radiation dose; VT; air kerma; atrial fibrillation; body mass index; dose area product; electronic pocket dosimeter; electrophysiologic; pulmonary vein isolation; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23973946     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  20 in total

1.  Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Shigeru Nakamura; Tomoko Kobayashi; Atsushi Funatsu; Tadahisa Okada; Maria Mauti; Yuki Waizumi; Shinichi Yamada
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.

Authors:  Patrick M Sullivan; David Harrison; Sarah Badran; Cheryl M Takao; Frank F Ing
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Can image enhancement allow radiation dose to be reduced whilst maintaining the perceived diagnostic image quality required for coronary angiography?

Authors:  Anuja Joshi; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Uduvil M Sivananthan; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comprehensive assessment of patient image quality and radiation dose in latest generation cardiac x-ray equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Daniel Egleston; Josephine Bexon; Stephen M Kengyelics; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-05-02

5.  Patient radiation dose in diagnostic and interventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms: experience at a single center.

Authors:  Chang Woo Chun; Bum-Soo Kim; Cheol Hyoun Lee; Yon Kwon Ihn; Yong-Sam Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Comparison of Radiation Exposure Among Interventional Echocardiographers, Interventional Cardiologists, and Sonographers During Percutaneous Structural Heart Interventions.

Authors:  David A McNamara; Rajus Chopra; Jeffrey M Decker; Michael W McNamara; Stacie M VanOosterhout; Duane C Berkompas; Musa I Dahu; Mohamad A Kenaan; Wassim I Jawad; William M Merhi; Jessica L Parker; Ryan D Madder
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Bashar Aldhoon; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

8.  Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Christoper J Malkin; Daniel Egleston; Josephine Bexon; Stephen M Kengyelics; Daniel Blackman; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Development of radiation exposure in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation in Germany between 2007 and 2014: great potential to minimize radiation dosage.

Authors:  Thomas Kleemann; Johannes Brachmann; Thorsten Lewalter; Dietrich Andresen; Stephan Willems; Stefan G Spitzer; Ellen Hoffmann; Lars Eckardt; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Karlheinz Seidl; Ralf Zahn
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  High filtration in interventional practices reduces patient radiation doses but not always scatter radiation doses.

Authors:  Roberto M Sanchez; Eliseo Vano; Pablo Salinas; Nieves Gonzalo; Javier Escaned; Jose M Fernández
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.