Literature DB >> 28770307

Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.

Patrick M Sullivan1,2, David Harrison3, Sarah Badran4, Cheryl M Takao4, Frank F Ing4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare radiation doses and imaging quality using Philips AlluraClarity (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) X-ray system and an older generation reference system. AlluraClarity is a new generation fluoroscopy system designed to reduce radiation without compromising image quality, but reports of its use in pediatric patients are limited. Dose area products (DAP, mGy cm2) and DAP/kg were compared in patients catheterized using Allura Xper and AlluraClarity systems over a year of use for each. Randomly selected studies from each system were assessed for image quality. The 430 patients imaged with Clarity were larger than the 332 imaged with Xper (median BSA: 0.74 vs. 0.64 m2, p = 0.06), and median total fluoroscopic times (TFT) were similar (15.8 vs. 16.1 min, p = 0.37). Median DAPs were 8661 mGy cm2 (IQR: 18,300 mGy cm2) and 4523 mGy cm2 (IQR: 11,596 mGy cm2) with Xper and Clarity, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in median DAP in all procedure categories. After adjustment for BSA, TFT, and procedure type, using Clarity was associated with a 57.5% (95% CI 51.5-62.8%, p < 0.001) reduction in DAP for all procedures. Reductions did not significantly differ by weight (<10 kg, 10-40 kg, ≥ 40 kg). There was an adjusted percent reduction in DAP for each procedure category ranging from 39.0% (95% CI 25.6-50.1%, p < 0.001) for cardiac biopsies with or without coronary angiography to 67.6% (95% CI 61.2-72.8%, p < 0.001) for device occlusions. Mean overall imaging quality scores (4.3 ± 0.8 with Clarity vs. 4.4 ± 0.6 with Xper, p = 0.62) and scores based on specific quality parameters were similar in the two groups. Use of AlluraClarity substantially reduced radiation doses compared to the older generation reference system without compromising imaging quality in a pediatric cardiac catheterization lab.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital cardiac catheterization; Fluoroscopy; Radiation; Radiation dose reduction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28770307     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-017-1700-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  26 in total

1.  New image-processing and noise-reduction software reduces radiation dose during complex endovascular procedures.

Authors:  Melissa L Kirkwood; Jeffrey B Guild; Gary M Arbique; Shirling Tsai; J Gregory Modrall; Jon A Anderson; John Rectenwald; Carlos Timaran
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Use of a dose-dependent follow-up protocol and mechanisms to reduce patients and staff radiation exposure in congenital and structural interventions.

Authors:  Jaclynn M Sawdy; Tanya Maria Kempton; Vincent Olshove; Mark Gocha; Joanne L Chisolm; Sharon L Hill; Amy Kirk; John P Cheatham; Ralf J Holzer
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Dose response and temporal patterns of radiation-associated solid cancer risks.

Authors:  D L Preston; D A Pierce; Y Shimizu; E Ron; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Lukas R C Dekker; Pepijn H van der Voort; Timothy A Simmers; Xander A A M Verbeek; Roland W M Bullens; Marcel Van't Veer; Peter J M Brands; Albert Meijer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 6.  The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.

Authors:  Henri Justino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

7.  Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients.

Authors:  Michael Söderman; Maria Mauti; Sjirk Boon; Artur Omar; María Marteinsdóttir; Tommy Andersson; Staffan Holmin; Bart Hoornaert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  The risk of cancer in patients with congenital heart disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yu-Sheng Lee; Yung-Tai Chen; Mei-Jy Jeng; Pei-Chen Tsao; Hsiu-Ju Yen; Pi-Chang Lee; Szu-Yuan Li; Chia-Jen Liu; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Pesus Chou; Wen-Jue Soong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Haas; Christoph M Happel; Maria Mauti; Cherif Sahyoun; Lea Z Tebart; Deniz Kececioglu; Kai Thorsten Laser
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-01-20

10.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiation Exposure During Transcatheter Valve Replacement: What Cardiac Surgeons Need to Know.

Authors:  Alejandro Aquino; Ali J Khiabani; Matthew C Henn; Alan Zajarias; Spencer J Melby; Marc Sintek; John Lasala; Puja Kachroo; Eric Novak; Hersh S Maniar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  High filtration in interventional practices reduces patient radiation doses but not always scatter radiation doses.

Authors:  Roberto M Sanchez; Eliseo Vano; Pablo Salinas; Nieves Gonzalo; Javier Escaned; Jose M Fernández
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Impact of dose reducing software on patient and staff temple dose during fluoroscopically guided pacemaker insertion, closure devices implantation and coronary angiography procedures.

Authors:  Kelly S Wilson-Stewart; Davide Fontanarosa; Eva Malacova; Jamie V Trapp
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Radiation dose reduction during adrenal vein sampling using a new angiographic imaging technology.

Authors:  Clemens Spink; Maxim Avanesov; Alexander Lenz; Frank Oliver Henes; Lennart Well; Thomas Schmidt; Gerhard Adam; Harald Ittrich; Peter Bannas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effect of Different Anthropometric Body Indexes on Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterisation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Youlin Koh; Sara Vogrin; Samer Noaman; Simon Lam; Raymond Pham; Andrew Clark; Leah Biffin; Laura B Hanson; Jason E Bloom; Dion Stub; Angela L Brennan; Christopher Reid; Diem T Dinh; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Nicholas Cox; William Chan
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-09-11

6.  Multicenter Assessment of Radiation Exposure during Pediatric Cardiac Catheterizations Using a Novel Imaging System.

Authors:  Luke J Lamers; Brian H Morray; Alan Nugent; Michael Speidel; Petch Suntharos; Lourdes Prieto
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.