Literature DB >> 23957846

Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

Alexander P Duryea1, William W Roberts, Charles A Cain, Hedieh A Tamaddoni, Timothy L Hall.   

Abstract

Rate-dependent efficacy has been extensively documented in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) stone comminution, with shock waves (SWs) delivered at a low rate producing more efficient fragmentation in comparison to those delivered at high rates. Cavitation is postulated to be the primary source underlying this rate phenomenon. Residual bubble nuclei that persist along the axis of SW propagation can drastically attenuate the waveform's negative phase, decreasing the energy which is ultimately delivered to the stone and compromising comminution. The effect is more pronounced at high rates, as residual nuclei have less time to passively dissolve between successive shocks. In this study, we investigate a means of actively removing such nuclei from the field using a low-amplitude acoustic pulse designed to stimulate their aggregation and subsequent coalescence. To test the efficacy of this bubble removal scheme, model kidney stones were treated in vitro using a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. SWL was applied at rates of 120, 60, or 30 SW/min with or without the incorporation of bubble removal pulses. Optical images displaying the extent of cavitation in the vicinity of the stone were also collected for each treatment. Results show that bubble removal pulses drastically enhance the efficacy of stone comminution at the higher rates tested (120 and 60 SW/min), while optical images show a corresponding reduction in bubble excitation along the SW axis when bubble removal pulses are incorporated. At the lower rate of 30 SW/min, no difference in stone comminution or bubble excitation was detected with the addition of bubble removal pulses, suggesting that remnant nuclei had sufficient time for more complete dissolution. These results corroborate previous work regarding the role of cavitation in rate-dependent SWL efficacy, and suggest that the effect can be mitigated via appropriate control of the cavitation environment surrounding the stone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23957846      PMCID: PMC3880900          DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  25 in total

1.  A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.

Authors:  R O Cleveland; O A Sapozhnikov; M R Bailey; L A Crum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of cavitational activity in fragmentation processes by lithotripters.

Authors:  W Sass; H P Dreyer; S Kettermann; J Seifert
Journal:  J Stone Dis       Date:  1992-07

3.  Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Yuji Kato; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Junichi Hori; Mitsuhiko Okuyama; Hidehiro Kakizaki
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  P Huber; K Jöchle; J Debus
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  P Zhong; I Cioanta; F H Cocks; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An experimental shock wave generator for lithotripsy studies.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders; M J Choi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Khaled Madbouly; Abdel Moneim El-Tiraifi; Mohamed Seida; Salah R El-Faqih; Ramiz Atassi; Riyadh F Talic
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Implications of cavitation phenomena for shot intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  H Wiksell; A C Kinn
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-06

9.  Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jaclyn Lautz; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?

Authors:  Job Chacko; Michael Moore; Noel Sankey; Paramjit S Chandhoke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  The influence of gas diffusion on bubble persistence in shock-scattering histotripsy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Viktor Bollen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones.

Authors:  Onur Kaygısız; Hakan Kılıçarslan; Ahmet Mert; Burhan Coşkun; Yakup Kordan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic Methods for Increasing the Cavitation Initiation Pressure Threshold.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; Alexander P Duryea; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 8.  Histotripsy methods in mechanical disintegration of tissue: towards clinical applications.

Authors:  Vera A Khokhlova; J Brian Fowlkes; William W Roberts; George R Schade; Zhen Xu; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Timothy L Hall; Adam D Maxwell; Yak-Nam Wang; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  Some Work on the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Stones with Ultrasound.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Adam D Maxwell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Acoust Today       Date:  2017

10.  Summary of "Biomedical Acoustics and Physical Acoustics: Shock Waves and Ultrasound for Calculus Fragmentation".

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2018-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.