Literature DB >> 23322027

Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Jaclyn Lautz1, Georgy Sankin, Pei Zhong.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that stone comminution decreases with increased pulse repetition frequency as a result of bubble proliferation in the cavitation field of a shock wave lithotripter (Pishchalnikov et al 2011 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130 EL87-93). If cavitation nuclei remain in the propagation path of successive lithotripter pulses, especially in the acoustic coupling cushion of the shock wave source, they will consume part of the incident wave energy, leading to reduced tensile pressure in the focal region and thus lower stone comminution efficiency. We introduce a method to remove cavitation nuclei from the coupling cushion between successive shock exposures using a jet of degassed water. As a result, pre-focal bubble nuclei lifetime quantified by B-mode ultrasound imaging was reduced from 7 to 0.3 s by a jet with an exit velocity of 62 cm s(-1). Stone fragmentation (percent mass <2 mm) after 250 shocks delivered at 1 Hz was enhanced from 22 ± 6% to 33 ± 5% (p = 0.007) in water without interposing tissue mimicking materials. Stone fragmentation after 500 shocks delivered at 2 Hz was increased from 18 ± 6% to 28 ± 8% (p = 0.04) with an interposing tissue phantom of 8 cm thick. These results demonstrate the critical influence of cavitation bubbles in the coupling cushion on stone comminution and suggest a potential strategy to improve the efficacy of contemporary shock wave lithotripters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322027      PMCID: PMC3693448          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  Control of cavitation activity by different shockwave pulsing regimes.

Authors:  P Huber; J Debus; K Jöchle; I Simiantonakis; J Jenne; R Rastert; J Spoo; W J Lorenz; M Wannenmacher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Shockwave frequency affects fragmentation in a kidney stone model.

Authors:  M J Weir; N Tariq; R J Honey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Yuji Kato; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Junichi Hori; Mitsuhiko Okuyama; Hidehiro Kakizaki
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Cavitation cluster dynamics in shock-wave lithotripsy: part 1. Free field.

Authors:  M Arora; L Junge; C D Ohl
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Evaluation of a shock wave induced cavitation activity both in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Juan Tu; Thomas J Matula; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Khaled Madbouly; Abdel Moneim El-Tiraifi; Mohamed Seida; Salah R El-Faqih; Ramiz Atassi; Riyadh F Talic
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties.

Authors:  Eric Esch; Walter Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Hadley F Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-22

8.  Simulation of the effects of cavitation and anatomy in the shock path of model lithotripters.

Authors:  Jeff Krimmel; Tim Colonius; Michel Tanguay
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

9.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Joshua S Neucks; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Anthony J Zancanaro; Jonathan N VonDerHaar; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-01-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Editorial Comment on: The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms by Randad et al. (From: Randad A, Ahn J, Bailey MR, et al. J Endourol 2019;33:400-406; DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0516).

Authors:  Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event: a parametric study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Yao; Ke Li; ShiQuan Huang; XueSong Cheng; XiaoLiang Jiang
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.