Literature DB >> 26077353

Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Christian G Chaussy1, Hans-Göran Tiselius.   

Abstract

Although shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) remains an excellent non-invasive method for active removal of stones from the ureter and kidney, its popularity has decreased during recent years and the arguments for choosing endoscopic procedures rather than the only non-invasive surgical procedure are usually based on the opinion that SWL results are inferior to those obtained with endoscopic methods. It is considered that slow technical progress has not sufficiently met the requirements of disintegration, reduced need of repeated treatments, shorter treatment duration and less negative effects on tissues. This article summarises some recently published articles that address these problems and have the aim of improving the function of lithotripters. Modification of the shock wave geometry, elimination or control of cavitation bubbles, and different techniques of disintegration studied in in vitro and in animal experiments suggest several possible future directions that might provide a basis for development of a new "gold standard" lithotripter.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077353     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-015-0524-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  36 in total

1.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

3.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The role of energy density and acoustic cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Achim M Loske
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines.

Authors:  J M Teichman; A J Portis; P P Cecconi; W L Bub; R C Endicott; B Denes; M S Pearle; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Minimally invasive treatment of infection staghorn stones with shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis.

Authors:  H G Tiselius; E Hellgren; A Andersson; A Borrud-Ohlsson; I Eriksson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999-10

7.  Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jaclyn Lautz; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Bret A Connors; Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Out-of-focus low pressure pulse pretreatment to the whole kidney to reduce renal injury during shockwave lithotripsy: an in vivo study using a rabbit model.

Authors:  Francisco Fernández; Alejandra Domínguez; Eduardo Castaño; Achim M Loske
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; John Denstedt; Petrisor Geavlete; Francis Keeley; Tadashi Matsuda; Margaret Pearle; Glenn Preminger; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.