Literature DB >> 10738826

A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.

R O Cleveland1, O A Sapozhnikov, M R Bailey, L A Crum.   

Abstract

A passive cavitation detector (PCD) identifies cavitation events by sensing acoustic emissions generated by the collapse of bubbles. In this work, a dual passive cavitation detector (dual PCD), consisting of a pair of orthogonal confocal receivers, is described for use in shock wave lithotripsy. Cavitation events are detected by both receivers and can be localized to within 5 mm by the nature of the small intersecting volume of the focal areas of the two receivers in association with a coincidence detection algorithm. A calibration technique, based on the impulse response of the transducer, was employed to estimate radiated pressures at collapse near the bubble. Results are presented for the in vitro cavitation fields of both a clinical and a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. The measured lifetime of the primary growth-and-collapse of the cavitation bubbles increased from 180 to 420 microseconds as the power setting was increased from 12 to 24 kV. The measured lifetime compared well with calculations based on the Gilmore-Akulichev formulation for bubble dynamics. The radiated acoustic pressure 10 mm from the collapsing cavitation bubble was measured to vary from 4 to 16 MPa with increasing power setting; although the trends agreed with calculations, the predicted values were four times larger than measured values. The axial length of the cavitation field correlated well with the 6-dB region of the acoustic field. However, the width of the cavitation field (10 mm) was significantly narrower than the acoustic field (25 mm) as bubbles appeared to be drawn to the acoustic axis during the collapse. The dual PCD also detected signals from "rebounds," secondary and tertiary growth-and-collapse cycles. The measured rebound time did not agree with calculations from the single-bubble model. The rebounds could be fitted to a Rayleigh collapse model by considering the entire bubble cloud as an effective single bubble. The results from the dual PCD agreed well with images from high-speed photography. The results indicate that single-bubble theory is sufficient to model lithotripsy cavitation dynamics up to time of the main collapse, but that upon collapse bubble cloud dynamics becomes important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738826     DOI: 10.1121/1.428572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Observations of the collapses and rebounds of millimeter-sized lithotripsy bubbles.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.

Authors:  Daniel A King; Michael J Malloy; Alayna C Roberts; Alexander Haak; Christian C Yoder; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Irina V Pishchalnikova; R Jason Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future.

Authors:  David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays.

Authors:  Vasant A Salgaonkar; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.