Literature DB >> 7613826

Implications of cavitation phenomena for shot intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

H Wiksell1, A C Kinn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of shot intervals and the quality of the coupling medium (degassed water) in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acoustic scattering and damping (and thereby also the focal size) were modelled with respect to the conditions of the coupling medium, using continuous wave high intensity ultrasound. The influence of the shot interval on rise time and attained shock wave pressure were quantified with a modified ESWL apparatus and a specially designed hydrophone.
RESULTS: In tap water, which has a high content of dissolved gases, the focus produced was bulb-shaped, with a diameter of approximately 4 cm, whereas degassed water gave a small focus that produced a water jet only a few millimetres in diameter. The efficacy of the acoustic energy decreased with shot intervals shorter than 1.2s. Longer pauses resulted only in prolonged treatment times.
CONCLUSION: ESWL becomes inefficient if the intervals between pulses are too short, particularly when ECG R-wave triggered pulses are used on patients with tachycardia. The gas content of the coupling medium is also important for successful ESWL. The efficacy of the system used for degassing the water should be checked at regular intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7613826     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07378.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  9 in total

1.  Perforation of hollow viscera as a result of lithotripsy caused by shock waves: why does this occur?

Authors:  Miguel Arrabal-Martin; Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-05-15

2.  Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event using low-amplitude ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event: a parametric study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Shock wave technology and application: an update.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Removal of residual cavitation nuclei to enhance histotripsy erosion of model urinary stones.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Extremely slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.

Authors:  Shinya Somiya; Shigeki Koterazawa; Katsuhiro Ito; Takao Haitani; Hitoshi Yamada; Toru Kanno
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.861

8.  Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ito; Toshifumi Takahashi; Toru Kanno; Takashi Okada; Yoshihito Higashi; Hitoshi Yamada
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-12-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.