BACKGROUND: In eukaryotic cells, detection of replication stress results in the activation of the DNA replication checkpoint, a signaling cascade whose central players are the kinases ATR and Chk1. The checkpoint response prevents the accumulation of DNA damage and ensures cell viability by delaying progression into mitosis. However, the role and mechanism of the replication checkpoint transcriptional response in human cells, which is p53 independent, is largely unknown. RESULTS: We show that, in response to DNA replication stress, the regular E2F-dependent cell-cycle transcriptional program is maintained at high levels, and we establish the mechanisms governing such transcriptional upregulation. E2F6, a repressor of E2F-dependent G1/S transcription, replaces the activating E2Fs at promoters to repress transcription in cells progressing into S phase in unperturbed conditions. After replication stress, the checkpoint kinase Chk1 phosphorylates E2F6, leading to its dissociation from promoters. This promotes E2F-dependent transcription, which mediates cell survival by preventing DNA damage and cell death. CONCLUSIONS: This work reveals, for the first time, that the regular cell-cycle transcriptional program is part of the DNA replication checkpoint response in human cells and establishes the molecular mechanism involved. We show that maintaining high levels of G1/S cell-cycle transcription in response to replication stress contributes to two key functions of the DNA replication checkpoint response, namely, preventing genomic instability and cell death. Given the critical role of replication stress in oncogene transformation, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the checkpoint response will contribute to a better insight into cancer development.
BACKGROUND: In eukaryotic cells, detection of replication stress results in the activation of the DNA replication checkpoint, a signaling cascade whose central players are the kinases ATR and Chk1. The checkpoint response prevents the accumulation of DNA damage and ensures cell viability by delaying progression into mitosis. However, the role and mechanism of the replication checkpoint transcriptional response in human cells, which is p53 independent, is largely unknown. RESULTS: We show that, in response to DNA replication stress, the regular E2F-dependent cell-cycle transcriptional program is maintained at high levels, and we establish the mechanisms governing such transcriptional upregulation. E2F6, a repressor of E2F-dependent G1/S transcription, replaces the activating E2Fs at promoters to repress transcription in cells progressing into S phase in unperturbed conditions. After replication stress, the checkpoint kinase Chk1 phosphorylates E2F6, leading to its dissociation from promoters. This promotes E2F-dependent transcription, which mediates cell survival by preventing DNA damage and cell death. CONCLUSIONS: This work reveals, for the first time, that the regular cell-cycle transcriptional program is part of the DNA replication checkpoint response in human cells and establishes the molecular mechanism involved. We show that maintaining high levels of G1/S cell-cycle transcription in response to replication stress contributes to two key functions of the DNA replication checkpoint response, namely, preventing genomic instability and cell death. Given the critical role of replication stress in oncogene transformation, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the checkpoint response will contribute to a better insight into cancer development.
Authors: H Takai; K Tominaga; N Motoyama; Y A Minamishima; H Nagahama; T Tsukiyama; K Ikeda; K Nakayama; M Nakanishi; K Nakayama Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2000-06-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Q Liu; S Guntuku; X S Cui; S Matsuoka; D Cortez; K Tamai; G Luo; S Carattini-Rivera; F DeMayo; A Bradley; L A Donehower; S J Elledge Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2000-06-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Bart Westendorp; Michal Mokry; Marian J A Groot Koerkamp; Frank C P Holstege; Edwin Cuppen; Alain de Bruin Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-12-17 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: M Lopes; C Cotta-Ramusino; A Pellicioli; G Liberi; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; C S Newlon; M Foiani Journal: Nature Date: 2001-08-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yin Liu; Sujun Chen; Su Wang; Fraser Soares; Martin Fischer; Feilong Meng; Zhou Du; Charles Lin; Clifford Meyer; James A DeCaprio; Myles Brown; X Shirley Liu; Housheng Hansen He Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel C Anacker; Heather L Aloor; Caitlin N Shepard; Gina M Lenzi; Bryan A Johnson; Baek Kim; Cary A Moody Journal: Virology Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Diego Dibitetto; Jennie R Sims; Carolline F R Ascenção; Kevin Feng; Dongsung Kim; Susannah Oberly; Raimundo Freire; Marcus B Smolka Journal: NAR Cancer Date: 2020-05-01