Literature DB >> 23954429

Chk1 inhibits E2F6 repressor function in response to replication stress to maintain cell-cycle transcription.

Cosetta Bertoli1, Steffi Klier, Clare McGowan, Curt Wittenberg, Robertus A M de Bruin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In eukaryotic cells, detection of replication stress results in the activation of the DNA replication checkpoint, a signaling cascade whose central players are the kinases ATR and Chk1. The checkpoint response prevents the accumulation of DNA damage and ensures cell viability by delaying progression into mitosis. However, the role and mechanism of the replication checkpoint transcriptional response in human cells, which is p53 independent, is largely unknown.
RESULTS: We show that, in response to DNA replication stress, the regular E2F-dependent cell-cycle transcriptional program is maintained at high levels, and we establish the mechanisms governing such transcriptional upregulation. E2F6, a repressor of E2F-dependent G1/S transcription, replaces the activating E2Fs at promoters to repress transcription in cells progressing into S phase in unperturbed conditions. After replication stress, the checkpoint kinase Chk1 phosphorylates E2F6, leading to its dissociation from promoters. This promotes E2F-dependent transcription, which mediates cell survival by preventing DNA damage and cell death.
CONCLUSIONS: This work reveals, for the first time, that the regular cell-cycle transcriptional program is part of the DNA replication checkpoint response in human cells and establishes the molecular mechanism involved. We show that maintaining high levels of G1/S cell-cycle transcription in response to replication stress contributes to two key functions of the DNA replication checkpoint response, namely, preventing genomic instability and cell death. Given the critical role of replication stress in oncogene transformation, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the checkpoint response will contribute to a better insight into cancer development.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954429      PMCID: PMC3977652          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  45 in total

1.  Cell cycle. Piecing together the p53 puzzle.

Authors:  A M Carr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage, mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  W C Lin; F T Lin; J R Nevins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1.

Authors:  H Zhao; H Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice.

Authors:  H Takai; K Tominaga; N Motoyama; Y A Minamishima; H Nagahama; T Tsukiyama; K Ikeda; K Nakayama; M Nakanishi; K Nakayama
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Q Liu; S Guntuku; X S Cui; S Matsuoka; D Cortez; K Tamai; G Luo; S Carattini-Rivera; F DeMayo; A Bradley; L A Donehower; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  p53 accumulates but is functionally impaired when DNA synthesis is blocked.

Authors:  V Gottifredi; S Shieh; Y Taya; C Prives
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  E2F7 represses a network of oscillating cell cycle genes to control S-phase progression.

Authors:  Bart Westendorp; Michal Mokry; Marian J A Groot Koerkamp; Frank C P Holstege; Edwin Cuppen; Alain de Bruin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M Lopes; C Cotta-Ramusino; A Pellicioli; G Liberi; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; C S Newlon; M Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways.

Authors:  N Rhind; P Russell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Topology and control of the cell-cycle-regulated transcriptional circuitry.

Authors:  Steven B Haase; Curt Wittenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress: Jigsaw Falling into Place.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kotsantis; Eva Petermann; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 3.  Transcriptional responses to DNA damage.

Authors:  Erica Silva; Trey Ideker
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-05-07

4.  Transcriptional landscape of the human cell cycle.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Sujun Chen; Su Wang; Fraser Soares; Martin Fischer; Feilong Meng; Zhou Du; Charles Lin; Clifford Meyer; James A DeCaprio; Myles Brown; X Shirley Liu; Housheng Hansen He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years.

Authors:  Michael Charles Lanz; Diego Dibitetto; Marcus Bustamante Smolka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  HPV31 utilizes the ATR-Chk1 pathway to maintain elevated RRM2 levels and a replication-competent environment in differentiating Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Daniel C Anacker; Heather L Aloor; Caitlin N Shepard; Gina M Lenzi; Bryan A Johnson; Baek Kim; Cary A Moody
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 7.  Modulation of the DNA damage response during the life cycle of human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Daniel C Anacker; Cary A Moody
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 8.  Impact of Replication Stress in Human Papillomavirus Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Cary A Moody
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Intrinsic ATR signaling shapes DNA end resection and suppresses toxic DNA-PKcs signaling.

Authors:  Diego Dibitetto; Jennie R Sims; Carolline F R Ascenção; Kevin Feng; Dongsung Kim; Susannah Oberly; Raimundo Freire; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 10.  A common strategy for initiating the transition from proliferation to quiescence.

Authors:  Shawna Miles; Linda Breeden
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.