Literature DB >> 27544284

A common strategy for initiating the transition from proliferation to quiescence.

Shawna Miles1, Linda Breeden2.   

Abstract

Development, tissue renewal and long term survival of multi-cellular organisms is dependent upon the persistence of stem cells that are quiescent, but retain the capacity to re-enter the cell cycle to self-renew, or to produce progeny that can differentiate and re-populate the tissue. Deregulated release of these cells from the quiescent state, or preventing them from entering quiescence, results in uncontrolled proliferation and cancer. Conversely, loss of quiescent cells, or their failure to re-enter cell division, disrupts organ development and prevents tissue regeneration and repair. Understanding the quiescent state and how cells control the transitions in and out of this state is of fundamental importance. Investigations into the mechanics of G1 arrest during the transition to quiescence continue to identify striking parallels between the strategies used by yeast and mammals to regulate this transition. When cells commit to a stable but reversible arrest, the G1/S genes responsible for promoting S phase must be inhibited. This process, from yeast to humans, involves the formation of quiescence-specific complexes on their promoters. In higher cells, these so-called DREAM complexes of E2F4/DP/RBL/MuvB recruit the highly conserved histone deacetylase HDAC1, which leads to local histone deacetylation and repression of S phase-promoting transcripts. Quiescent yeast cells also show pervasive histone deacetylation by the HDAC1 counterpart Rpd3. In addition, these cells contain quiescence-specific regulators of G1/S genes: Msa1 and Msa2, which can be considered components of the yeast equivalent of the DREAM complex. Despite a lack of physical similarities, the goals and the strategies used to achieve a reversible transition to quiescence are highly conserved. This motivates a detailed study of this process in the simple model organism: budding yeast.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E2F; HDAC1; Msa1; Msa2; MuvB; RB; Rpd3; SBF

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27544284      PMCID: PMC5508718          DOI: 10.1007/s00294-016-0640-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genet        ISSN: 0172-8083            Impact factor:   3.886


  60 in total

1.  Cln3 activates G1-specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5.

Authors:  Robertus A M de Bruin; W Hayes McDonald; Tatyana I Kalashnikova; John Yates; Curt Wittenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Native E2F/RBF complexes contain Myb-interacting proteins and repress transcription of developmentally controlled E2F target genes.

Authors:  Michael Korenjak; Barbie Taylor-Harding; Ulrich K Binné; John S Satterlee; Olivier Stevaux; Rein Aasland; Helen White-Cooper; Nick Dyson; Alexander Brehm
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Effective targeting of quiescent chronic myelogenous leukemia stem cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors in combination with imatinib mesylate.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Adam C Strauss; Su Chu; Min Li; Yinwei Ho; Keh-Dong Shiang; David S Snyder; Claudia S Huettner; Leonard Shultz; Tessa Holyoake; Ravi Bhatia
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  New yeast genes important for chromosome integrity and segregation identified by dosage effects on genome stability.

Authors:  I I Ouspenski; S J Elledge; B R Brinkley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Xbp1, a stress-induced transcriptional repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi4/Mbp1 family.

Authors:  B Mai; L Breeden
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors and HIV latency.

Authors:  David M Margolis
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.283

7.  A role for the transcription factors Mbp1 and Swi4 in progression from G1 to S phase.

Authors:  C Koch; T Moll; M Neuberg; H Ahorn; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A Whi7-anchored loop controls the G1 Cdk-cyclin complex at start.

Authors:  Galal Yahya; Eva Parisi; Alba Flores; Carme Gallego; Martí Aldea
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Divergent roles of HDAC1 and HDAC2 in the regulation of epidermal development and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mircea Winter; Mirjam A Moser; Dominique Meunier; Carina Fischer; Georg Machat; Katharina Mattes; Beate M Lichtenberger; Reinhard Brunmeir; Simon Weissmann; Christina Murko; Christina Humer; Tina Meischel; Gerald Brosch; Patrick Matthias; Maria Sibilia; Christian Seiser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Key events during the transition from rapid growth to quiescence in budding yeast require posttranscriptional regulators.

Authors:  Lihong Li; Shawna Miles; Zephan Melville; Amalthiya Prasad; Graham Bradley; Linda L Breeden
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cellular quiescence in budding yeast.

Authors:  Siyu Sun; David Gresham
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 2.  The interplay of histone H2B ubiquitination with budding and fission yeast heterochromatin.

Authors:  Alexis Zukowski; Aaron M Johnson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 3.  Tumor suppressor stars in yeast G1/S transition.

Authors:  Pan Li; Zhimin Hao; Fanli Zeng
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 4.  Stress response factors drive regrowth of quiescent cells.

Authors:  Zheng Kuang; Hongkai Ji; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 5.  Connecting virulence pathways to cell-cycle progression in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Christina M Kelliher; Steven B Haase
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 6.  Transcriptional reprogramming in cellular quiescence.

Authors:  Benjamin Roche; Benoit Arcangioli; Robert Martienssen
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 7.  Starvation signals in yeast are integrated to coordinate metabolic reprogramming and stress response to ensure longevity.

Authors:  Nianshu Zhang; Lu Cao
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 8.  Mechanisms that Link Chronological Aging to Cellular Quiescence in Budding Yeast.

Authors:  Karamat Mohammad; Jennifer Anne Baratang Junio; Tala Tafakori; Emmanuel Orfanos; Vladimir I Titorenko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Gcn5 and Rpd3 have a limited role in the regulation of cell cycle transcripts during the G1 and S phases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Kishkevich; S L Cooke; M R A Harris; R A M de Bruin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Epigenetic regulators Rbbp4 and Hdac1 are overexpressed in a zebrafish model of RB1 embryonal brain tumor, and are required for neural progenitor survival and proliferation.

Authors:  Laura E Schultz; Jeffrey A Haltom; Maira P Almeida; Wesley A Wierson; Staci L Solin; Trevor J Weiss; Jordan A Helmer; Elizabeth J Sandquist; Heather R Shive; Maura McGrail
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.