PURPOSE: To evaluate whether semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) acquired early in treatment can predict the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of an IRB-approved prospective study, 21 patients with LABC provided informed consent and underwent high temporal resolution 3T DCE-MRI before and after 1cycle of NAC. Using measurements performed by two radiologists, the following parameters were extracted for lesions at both examinations: lesion size (short and long axes, in both early and late phases of enhancement), radiologist's subjective assessment of lesion enhancement, and percentages of voxels within the lesion demonstrating progressive, plateau, or washout kinetics. The latter data were calculated using two filters, one selecting for voxels enhancing ≥50% over baseline and one for voxels enhancing ≥100% over baseline. Pretreatment imaging parameters and parameter changes following cycle 1 of NAC were evaluated for their ability to discriminate patients with an eventual pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS: All 21 patients completed NAC followed by surgery, with 9 patients achieving a pCR. No pretreatment imaging parameters were predictive of pCR. However, change after cycle 1 of NAC in percentage of voxels demonstrating washout kinetics with a 100% enhancement filter discriminated patients with an eventual pCR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.77. Changes in other parameters, including lesion size, did not predict pCR. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution DCE-MRI in patients with LABC can discriminate patients with an eventual pCR after one cycle of NAC.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) acquired early in treatment can predict the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of an IRB-approved prospective study, 21 patients with LABC provided informed consent and underwent high temporal resolution 3T DCE-MRI before and after 1cycle of NAC. Using measurements performed by two radiologists, the following parameters were extracted for lesions at both examinations: lesion size (short and long axes, in both early and late phases of enhancement), radiologist's subjective assessment of lesion enhancement, and percentages of voxels within the lesion demonstrating progressive, plateau, or washout kinetics. The latter data were calculated using two filters, one selecting for voxels enhancing ≥50% over baseline and one for voxels enhancing ≥100% over baseline. Pretreatment imaging parameters and parameter changes following cycle 1 of NAC were evaluated for their ability to discriminate patients with an eventual pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS: All 21 patients completed NAC followed by surgery, with 9 patients achieving a pCR. No pretreatment imaging parameters were predictive of pCR. However, change after cycle 1 of NAC in percentage of voxels demonstrating washout kinetics with a 100% enhancement filter discriminated patients with an eventual pCR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.77. Changes in other parameters, including lesion size, did not predict pCR. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution DCE-MRI in patients with LABC can discriminate patients with an eventual pCR after one cycle of NAC.
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Debasish Tripathy; Dulcy S Wolverton; Hope S Rugo; E Shelley Hwang; Cheryl A Ewing; Nola M Hylton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; Donald Berry; Lisa A Carey; Marco Colleoni; Mitchell Dowsett; Matthew Ellis; Judy E Garber; David Mankoff; Soonmyung Paik; Lajos Pusztai; Mary Lou Smith; JoAnne Zujewski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier; Laurence Vanlemmens; Marie-Christine Baranzelli; Philippe Vennin; Véronique Servent; Charles Fournier; Philippe Carpentier; Jacques Bonneterre Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Antonio C Wolff; Edward Gabrielson; Hind Warzecha; Stacie Jeter; David A Bluemke; Richard Wahl; Vered Stearns Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sina Meisamy; Patrick J Bolan; Eva H Baker; Robin L Bliss; Evin Gulbahce; Lenore I Everson; Michael T Nelson; Tim H Emory; Todd M Tuttle; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yangming Ou; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Sarah Englander; Xiao Da; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Mark Rosen; Angela DeMichele; Christos Davatzikos; Despina Kontos Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jennifer L Boes; Benjamin A Hoff; Nola Hylton; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull; Anne F Schott; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Ryan Chamberlain; Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Brian D Ross Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Vandana Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Praveen Pendyala; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 12.701