Literature DB >> 23954320

Early assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by semi-quantitative analysis of high-temporal resolution DCE-MRI: preliminary results.

Richard G Abramson1, Xia Li, Tamarya Lea Hoyt, Pei-Fang Su, Lori R Arlinghaus, Kevin J Wilson, Vandana G Abramson, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) acquired early in treatment can predict the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of an IRB-approved prospective study, 21 patients with LABC provided informed consent and underwent high temporal resolution 3T DCE-MRI before and after 1cycle of NAC. Using measurements performed by two radiologists, the following parameters were extracted for lesions at both examinations: lesion size (short and long axes, in both early and late phases of enhancement), radiologist's subjective assessment of lesion enhancement, and percentages of voxels within the lesion demonstrating progressive, plateau, or washout kinetics. The latter data were calculated using two filters, one selecting for voxels enhancing ≥50% over baseline and one for voxels enhancing ≥100% over baseline. Pretreatment imaging parameters and parameter changes following cycle 1 of NAC were evaluated for their ability to discriminate patients with an eventual pathological complete response (pCR).
RESULTS: All 21 patients completed NAC followed by surgery, with 9 patients achieving a pCR. No pretreatment imaging parameters were predictive of pCR. However, change after cycle 1 of NAC in percentage of voxels demonstrating washout kinetics with a 100% enhancement filter discriminated patients with an eventual pCR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.77. Changes in other parameters, including lesion size, did not predict pCR.
CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution DCE-MRI in patients with LABC can discriminate patients with an eventual pCR after one cycle of NAC.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; Enhancement kinetics; Imaging biomarkers; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Operable breast cancer; Preoperative chemotherapy; Primary chemotherapy; Response assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954320      PMCID: PMC3807825          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  39 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Debasish Tripathy; Dulcy S Wolverton; Hope S Rugo; E Shelley Hwang; Cheryl A Ewing; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Research issues affecting preoperative systemic therapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; Donald Berry; Lisa A Carey; Marco Colleoni; Mitchell Dowsett; Matthew Ellis; Judy E Garber; David Mankoff; Soonmyung Paik; Lajos Pusztai; Mary Lou Smith; JoAnne Zujewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Mototaka Miyake; Tomoaki Nagaoka; Takashi Terauchi; Kazunori Kubota; Takayuki Kinoshita; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Predictive value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy failure in breast cancer using FDG-PET after the first course.

Authors:  Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier; Laurence Vanlemmens; Marie-Christine Baranzelli; Philippe Vennin; Véronique Servent; Charles Fournier; Philippe Carpentier; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multiparametric, ²³Na sodium MR, and multimodality (PET/CT/MRI) imaging in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Antonio C Wolff; Edward Gabrielson; Hind Warzecha; Stacie Jeter; David A Bluemke; Richard Wahl; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Michael A Jacobs; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer: predicting response with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy--a pilot study at 4 T.

Authors:  Sina Meisamy; Patrick J Bolan; Eva H Baker; Robin L Bliss; Evin Gulbahce; Lenore I Everson; Michael T Nelson; Tim H Emory; Todd M Tuttle; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by using MR imaging and quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hyeon-Man Baek; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ke Nie; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of transcytolemmal water exchange analysis for therapeutic response assessment using DCE-MRI: a comparison study.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Ergys Subashi; Xiao Liang; Fang-Fang Yin; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The Attenuation Distribution Across the Long Axis (ADLA): Preliminary Findings for Assessing Response to Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Nikita Lakomkin; Hakmook Kang; Bennett Landman; M Shane Hutson; Richard G Abramson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer clinical trials: potential roles and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Rana R McKay; Clair J Beard; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Intratumor partitioning and texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI identifies relevant tumor subregions to predict pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Guanghua Gong; Yi Cui; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Deformable registration for quantifying longitudinal tumor changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Sarah Englander; Xiao Da; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Mark Rosen; Angela DeMichele; Christos Davatzikos; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for small animals at 7T using 3D ultra-short echo time and golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Li Feng; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Jennifer L Boes; Benjamin A Hoff; Nola Hylton; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull; Anne F Schott; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Ryan Chamberlain; Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Impact of Machine Learning With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amirhessam Tahmassebi; Georg J Wengert; Thomas H Helbich; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Sousan Alaei; Rupert Bartsch; Peter Dubsky; Pascal Baltzer; Paola Clauser; Panagiotis Kapetas; Elizabeth A Morris; Anke Meyer-Baese; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using a Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Vandana Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Praveen Pendyala; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.