Literature DB >> 27272391

Evaluation of the effect of transcytolemmal water exchange analysis for therapeutic response assessment using DCE-MRI: a comparison study.

Chunhao Wang1, Ergys Subashi, Xiao Liang, Fang-Fang Yin, Zheng Chang.   

Abstract

This study compares the shutter-speed (SS) and the Tofts models as used in assessing therapeutic response in a longitudinal DCE-MRI experiment. Sixteen nu/nu mice with implanted colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line (LS-174T) were randomly assigned into treatment/control groups (n  =  8/group) and received bevacizumab/saline twice weekly (Day1/Day4/Day8). All mice were scanned at one pre- (Day0) and two post-treatment (Day2/Day9) time points using a high spatiotemporal resolution DCE-MRI pulse sequence. The CA extravasation rate constant [Formula: see text] from the Tofts/SS model and the mean intracellular water residence time [Formula: see text] from the SS model were analyzed. A biological subvolume (BV) within the tumor was identified based on the [Formula: see text] intensity distribution, and the SS model parameters within the BV ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) were analyzed. It is found that [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] have a similar spatial distribution in the tumor volume. The Bayesian information criterion results show that the SS model was a better fit for all scans. At Day9, the treatment group had significantly higher tumor mean [Formula: see text] (p  =  0.021), [Formula: see text] (p  =  0.021) and [Formula: see text] (p  = 0.045). When BV from transcytolemmal water exchange analysis was adopted, the treatment group had higher mean [Formula: see text] at both Day2 (p  =  0.038) and Day9 (p  =  0.007). Additionally, at Day9, the treatment group had higher mean [Formula: see text] (p  =  0.045) and higher [Formula: see text] spatial heterogeneity indices (Rényi dimensions) d 1 (p  = 0.010) and d 2 (p  = 0.021). When mean [Formula: see text] and its coefficient of variation (CV) were used to separate treatment/control group samples using supporting vector machine, the accuracy of treatment/control classification was 68.8% at Day2 and 87.5% at Day9; in contrast, the Day2/Day9 accuracy were 62.5%/87.5% using tumor mean [Formula: see text] and its CV and were 50.0%/87.5% using tumor mean [Formula: see text] and its CV, respectively. These results suggest that the SS model parameters outperformed the Tofts model parameters in terms of capturing bevacizumab therapeutic effect in this longitudinal experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27272391      PMCID: PMC4929833          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/13/4763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  53 in total

1.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kenya Murase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting.

Authors:  Uulke A van der Heide; Antonetta C Houweling; Greetje Groenendaal; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Ulrich Bick; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain; Dan G Duda; Jeffrey W Clark; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2006-01

7.  Heterogeneity in DCE-MRI parametric maps: a biomarker for treatment response?

Authors:  L Alic; M van Vliet; C F van Dijke; A M M Eggermont; J F Veenland; W J Niessen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents at 7 Tesla: in vitro T1 relaxivities in human blood plasma.

Authors:  Iris M Noebauer-Huhmann; Pavol Szomolanyi; Vladimír Juras; Oliver Kraff; Mark E Ladd; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Min-Ying Su; Yun-Chung Cheung; John P Fruehauf; Hon Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Eugene Mechetner; Ainura Kyshtoobayeva; Shin-Cheh Chen; Swei Hsueh; Christine E McLaren; Yung-Liang Wan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents.

Authors:  J P B O'Connor; A Jackson; G J M Parker; G C Jayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas using multi-modality MRI imaging and radiomics analysis.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Wenzheng Sun; John Kirkpatrick; Zheng Chang; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.