Literature DB >> 17102046

Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.

Katarzyna J Macura1, Ronald Ouwerkerk, Michael A Jacobs, David A Bluemke.   

Abstract

The role of dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast as an adjunct to the conventional techniques of mammography and ultrasonography has been established in numerous research studies. MR imaging improves the detection and characterization of primary and recurrent breast cancers and allows evaluation of the response to therapy. The breast imaging lexicon published by the American College of Radiology allows a standardized and consistent description of the morphologic and kinetic characteristics of breast lesions; however, there are many challenges in the interpretation of breast enhancement patterns and kinetics, and many imaging and interpretation pitfalls must be considered. New breast MR imaging techniques that are based on the use of molecular markers of malignancy may help improve lesion characterization. The margin characteristics of a lesion and the intensity of its enhancement at MR imaging 2 minutes or less after contrast material injection are currently considered the most important features for breast lesion diagnosis. RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17102046      PMCID: PMC5952612          DOI: 10.1148/rg.266065025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  34 in total

1.  A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images.

Authors:  M D Schnall; S Rosten; S Englander; S G Orel; L W Nunes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Problem solving MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Carol H Lee
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; A Elevelt; C C Leutner; J Gieseke; E Pakos; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Proton MR spectroscopy of squamous cell carcinoma of the extracranial head and neck: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  S K Mukherji; S Schiro; M Castillo; L Kwock; K E Muller; W Blackstock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma.

Authors:  E A Morris; L H Schwartz; D D Dershaw; K J van Zee; A F Abramson; L Liberman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Peter B Barker; David A Bluemke; Cindy Maranto; Cheryl Arnold; Edward H Herskovits; Zaver Bhujwalla
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  In vivo 1H MRS of normal breast and breast tumors using a dedicated double breast coil.

Authors:  I S Gribbestad; T E Singstad; G Nilsen; H E Fjøsne; T Engan; O A Haugen; P A Rinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  44 in total

1.  MR evaluation of sinonasal angiomatous polyp.

Authors:  Y Z Wang; B T Yang; Z C Wang; L Song; J F Xian
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

Authors:  I Millet; E Pages; D Hoa; S Merigeaud; F Curros Doyon; X Prat; P Taourel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps.

Authors:  A C Schmitz; N H G M Peters; W B Veldhuis; A M Fernandez Gallardo; P J van Diest; G Stapper; R van Hillegersberg; W P Th M Mali; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement?

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Xiaobing Fan; Gregory S Karczmar; Hiroyuki Abe; Robert A Schmidt; Maryellen Giger; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Role of DCE-MR in predicting breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Marco Macchini; Martina Ponziani; Andrea Prochowski Iamurri; Mirco Pistelli; Mariagrazia De Lisa; Rossana Berardi; Gian Marco Giuseppetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Automated chest wall line detection for whole-breast segmentation in sagittal breast MR images.

Authors:  Shandong Wu; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Mitchell D Schnall; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Unveiling the histopathologic spectrum of MRI-guided breast biopsies: an institutional pathological-radiological correlation.

Authors:  Gustavo Moreno; Mariel Molina; Ruizhe Wu; Julie R Sullivan; Julie M Jorns
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment.

Authors:  Riham H El Khouli; Katarzyna J Macura; Michael A Jacobs; Tarek H Khalil; Ihab R Kamel; Andrew Dwyer; David A Bluemke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dragana Roganovic; Dragana Djilas; Sasa Vujnovic; Dag Pavic; Dragan Stojanov
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.363

10.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.