Literature DB >> 30358693

Impact of Machine Learning With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Amirhessam Tahmassebi, Georg J Wengert1, Thomas H Helbich1, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath2, Sousan Alaei2, Rupert Bartsch3, Peter Dubsky4, Pascal Baltzer1, Paola Clauser1, Panagiotis Kapetas1, Elizabeth A Morris5, Anke Meyer-Baese, Katja Pinker5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the potential of machine learning with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the early prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and of survival outcomes in breast cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved prospective study included 38 women (median age, 46.5 years; range, 25-70 years) with breast cancer who were scheduled for NAC and underwent mpMRI of the breast at 3 T with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and T2-weighted imaging before and after 2 cycles of NAC. For each lesion, 23 features were extracted: qualitative T2-weighted and DCE-MRI features according to BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System), quantitative pharmacokinetic DCE features (mean plasma flow, volume distribution, mean transit time), and DWI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. To apply machine learning to mpMRI, 8 classifiers including linear support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, random forests, stochastic gradient descent, decision tree, adaptive boosting, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were used to rank the features. Histopathologic residual cancer burden (RCB) class (with RCB 0 being a pCR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were used as the standards of reference. Classification accuracy with area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed using all the extracted qualitative and quantitative features for pCR as defined by RCB class, RFS, and DSS using recursive feature elimination. To overcome overfitting, 4-fold cross-validation was used.
RESULTS: Machine learning with mpMRI achieved stable performance as shown by mean classification accuracies for the prediction of RCB class (AUC, 0.86) and DSS (AUC, 0.92) based on XGBoost and the prediction of RFS (AUC, 0.83) with logistic regression. The XGBoost classifier achieved the most stable performance with high accuracies compared with other classifiers. The most relevant features for the prediction of RCB class were as follows: changes in lesion size, complete pattern of shrinkage, and mean transit time on DCE-MRI; minimum ADC on DWI; and peritumoral edema on T2-weighted imaging. The most relevant features for prediction of RFS were as follows: volume distribution, mean plasma flow, and mean transit time; DCE-MRI lesion size; minimum, maximum, and mean ADC with DWI. The most relevant features for prediction of DSS were as follows: lesion size, volume distribution, and mean plasma flow on DCE-MRI, and maximum ADC with DWI.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning with mpMRI of the breast enables early prediction of pCR to NAC as well as survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with high accuracy and thus may provide valuable predictive information to guide treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30358693      PMCID: PMC6310100          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  36 in total

1.  Pathological complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Charles E Geyer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017.

Authors:  G Curigliano; H J Burstein; E P Winer; M Gnant; P Dubsky; S Loibl; M Colleoni; M M Regan; M Piccart-Gebhart; H-J Senn; B Thürlimann; F André; J Baselga; J Bergh; H Bonnefoi; S Y Brucker; F Cardoso; L Carey; E Ciruelos; J Cuzick; C Denkert; A Di Leo; B Ejlertsen; P Francis; V Galimberti; J Garber; B Gulluoglu; P Goodwin; N Harbeck; D F Hayes; C-S Huang; J Huober; H Khaled; J Jassem; Z Jiang; P Karlsson; M Morrow; R Orecchia; K C Osborne; O Pagani; A H Partridge; K Pritchard; J Ro; E J T Rutgers; F Sedlmayer; V Semiglazov; Z Shao; I Smith; M Toi; A Tutt; G Viale; T Watanabe; T J Whelan; B Xu
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods.

Authors:  Dursun Delen; Glenn Walker; Amit Kadam
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Multi-parametric MRI in the early prediction of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Value of non-modelled parameters.

Authors:  Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; David Collins; James D'Arcy; Maria Schmidt; Nandita M de Souza
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Role of diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to contrast-enhanced breast MRI in evaluating residual breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Soo Yeon Hahn; Eun Young Ko; Boo-Kyung Han; Jung Hee Shin; Eun Sook Ko
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Osman Ratib
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Faranak Aghaei; Maxine Tan; Alan B Hollingsworth; Wei Qian; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on breast DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Braman; Maryam Etesami; Prateek Prasanna; Christina Dubchuk; Hannah Gilmore; Pallavi Tiwari; Donna Plecha; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction.

Authors:  Konstantina Kourou; Themis P Exarchos; Konstantinos P Exarchos; Michalis V Karamouzis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.271

View more
  51 in total

1.  Pre-operative Microvascular Invasion Prediction Using Multi-parametric Liver MRI Radiomics.

Authors:  Giacomo Nebbia; Qian Zhang; Dooman Arefan; Xinxiang Zhao; Shandong Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Breast MRI radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Alexandra Edwards; Christopher Doyle; John Papaioannou; Kirti Kulkarni; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-09-30

Review 3.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Application of machine learning with multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography of the breast to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  Xiaosong Lan; Xiaoxia Wang; Jun Qi; Huifang Chen; Xiangfei Zeng; Jinfang Shi; Daihong Liu; Hesong Shen; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

Review 5.  Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Hiroko Satake; Satoko Ishigaki; Rintaro Ito; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Susan G. Komen Big Data for Breast Cancer Initiative: How Patient Advocacy Organizations Can Facilitate Using Big Data to Improve Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Jerome Jourquin; Stephanie Birkey Reffey; Cheryl Jernigan; Mia Levy; Glendon Zinser; Kimberly Sabelko; Jennifer Pietenpol; George Sledge
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-09-12

7.  Machine learning classification of texture features of MRI breast tumor and peri-tumor of combined pre- and early treatment predicts pathologic complete response.

Authors:  Lal Hussain; Pauline Huang; Tony Nguyen; Kashif J Lone; Amjad Ali; Muhammad Salman Khan; Haifang Li; Doug Young Suh; Tim Q Duong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Machine Learning for Predicting the 3-Year Risk of Incident Diabetes in Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Yang Wu; Haofei Hu; Jinlin Cai; Runtian Chen; Xin Zuo; Heng Cheng; Dewen Yan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29

9.  Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response by exploiting a transfer learning approach on breast DCE-MRIs.

Authors:  Maria Colomba Comes; Annarita Fanizzi; Samantha Bove; Vittorio Didonna; Sergio Diotaiuti; Daniele La Forgia; Agnese Latorre; Eugenio Martinelli; Arianna Mencattini; Annalisa Nardone; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Cosmo Maurizio Ressa; Pasquale Tamborra; Vito Lorusso; Raffaella Massafra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Synthesis, radiolabelling, and biological assessment of folic acid-conjugated G-3 99mTc-dendrimer as the breast cancer molecular imaging agent.

Authors:  Saedeh Zamani; Mehdi Shafeie-Ardestani; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi; Ali Khalaj; Omid Sabzevari
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.