Literature DB >> 27052524

The Attenuation Distribution Across the Long Axis (ADLA): Preliminary Findings for Assessing Response to Cancer Treatment.

Nikita Lakomkin1, Hakmook Kang2, Bennett Landman3, M Shane Hutson3, Richard G Abramson4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Novel image analysis methods may be useful adjuncts to standard cancer treatment response assessment techniques. The attenuation distribution across the long axis (ADLA) is a simple measure of lesion heterogeneity that can be obtained while measuring the long axis diameter of a target lesion. The purpose of this study was to obtain preliminary validation of the ADLA method for predicting treatment response in a small clinical trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under an Institutional Review Board waiver, we obtained de-identified imaging and clinical data from a phase 2 trial of an investigational anticancer therapy at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with at least one liver metastasis measuring ≥15 mm on baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography. For each patient at every imaging time point, up to two target liver lesions were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and ADLA measurements. The ADLA was obtained as the standard deviation of the post-contrast computed tomography attenuation values in the portal venous phase across a linear function spanning the long-axis diameter. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log-rank test was used to evaluate the ability of RECIST 1.1 and ADLA measurements to discriminate patients with longer overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria. Median survival was 149 days (range 57-487). Best overall response by the ADLA method successfully separated patients with longer OS (p = .04). Best overall response by RECIST 1.1 did not discriminate patients with longer survival (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: In retrospective data analysis from a phase 2 clinical trial, the ADLA method was more predictive of OS than RECIST 1.1. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of this measurement in predicting response to cancer treatment.
Copyright © 2016 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging biomarker; bevacizumab; cancer imaging; overall survival; quantitative imaging; response assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27052524      PMCID: PMC5826561          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  20 in total

1.  Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy.

Authors:  Andrew Dennis Smith; Shetal N Shah; Brian I Rini; Michael L Lieber; Erick M Remer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Jeffrey J Luci; Martin Lepage; Rui Li; Laura Debusk; P Charles Lin; Ronald R Price; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment--using new and conventional criteria.

Authors:  Vahid Yaghmai; Frank H Miller; Pedram Rezai; Al B Benson; Riad Salem
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Early assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by semi-quantitative analysis of high-temporal resolution DCE-MRI: preliminary results.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Xia Li; Tamarya Lea Hoyt; Pei-Fang Su; Lori R Arlinghaus; Kevin J Wilson; Vandana G Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Andrew Dennis Smith; Michael L Lieber; Shetal N Shah
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Response evaluation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: RECIST version 1.1 versus modified CT criteria.

Authors:  Woo-Suk Chung; Mi-Suk Park; Sang Joon Shin; Song-Ee Baek; Yeo-Eun Kim; Jin Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 9.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: CT perfusion of liver and tumor tissue--initial experience.

Authors:  Dushyant V Sahani; Nagaraj-Setty Holalkere; Peter R Mueller; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  ePAD: An Image Annotation and Analysis Platform for Quantitative Imaging.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Mete Ugur Akdogan; Cavit Altindag; Emel Alkim
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.