S Grandl1, M Ingrisch, K Hellerhoff. 1. Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland, susanne.grandl@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being applied in patients with operable breast cancer. Thus, an early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of high relevance. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The interobserver variability of clinical examination, mammography and ultrasonography in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is high. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows the assessment of functional parameters in addition to changes in tumor size and morphology. PERFORMANCE: A reliable therapy response monitoring aims at optimizing individualized patient care. ACHIEVEMENTS: This paper summarizes current guidelines for the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Furthermore, the technical principles of MRI-based therapy monitoring are described and an overview of the clinical studies that have assessed the feasibility of functional MRI in response to treatment evaluation is given. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The technology of functional MRI offers promising results concerning therapy response monitoring. However, the level of evidence is not sufficiently evaluated for the technologies of functional MRI presented here.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being applied in patients with operable breast cancer. Thus, an early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of high relevance. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The interobserver variability of clinical examination, mammography and ultrasonography in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is high. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows the assessment of functional parameters in addition to changes in tumor size and morphology. PERFORMANCE: A reliable therapy response monitoring aims at optimizing individualized patient care. ACHIEVEMENTS: This paper summarizes current guidelines for the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Furthermore, the technical principles of MRI-based therapy monitoring are described and an overview of the clinical studies that have assessed the feasibility of functional MRI in response to treatment evaluation is given. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The technology of functional MRI offers promising results concerning therapy response monitoring. However, the level of evidence is not sufficiently evaluated for the technologies of functional MRI presented here.
Authors: Jennifer F De Los Santos; Alan Cantor; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Mehra Golshan; Janet K Horton; Clifford A Hudis; Nola M Hylton; Kandace McGuire; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ingrid M Meszoely; Rita Nanda; E Shelley Hwang Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Prevos; M L Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger; M B I Lobbes Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S M Swain; R A Sorace; C S Bagley; D N Danforth; J Bader; M N Wesley; S M Steinberg; M E Lippman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1987-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys Journal: Radiology Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rita A Mukhtar; Christina Yau; Mark Rosen; Vickram J Tandon; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 5.344