Literature DB >> 23929981

Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells.

Vassilis Roukos1, Ty C Voss, Christine K Schmidt, Seungtaek Lee, Darawalee Wangsa, Tom Misteli.   

Abstract

Chromosome translocations are a hallmark of cancer cells. We have developed an experimental system to visualize the formation of translocations in living cells and apply it to characterize the spatial and dynamic properties of translocation formation. We demonstrate that translocations form within hours of the occurrence of double-strand breaks (DSBs) and that their formation is cell cycle-independent. Translocations form preferentially between prepositioned genome elements, and perturbation of key factors of the DNA repair machinery uncouples DSB pairing from translocation formation. These observations generate a spatiotemporal framework for the formation of translocations in living cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23929981      PMCID: PMC6324928          DOI: 10.1126/science.1237150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  16 in total

1.  Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains.

Authors:  Jacob A Aten; Jan Stap; Przemek M Krawczyk; Carel H van Oven; Ron A Hoebe; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Formation of NHEJ-derived reciprocal chromosomal translocations does not require Ku70.

Authors:  David M Weinstock; Erika Brunet; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Evi Soutoglou; Jonas F Dorn; Kundan Sengupta; Maria Jasin; Andre Nussenzweig; Thomas Ried; Gaudenz Danuser; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Live cell microscopy analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand break motion.

Authors:  B Jakob; J Splinter; M Durante; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  Karen J Meaburn; Tom Misteli; Evi Soutoglou
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  A forward chemical genetic screen reveals an inhibitor of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex.

Authors:  Aude Dupré; Louise Boyer-Chatenet; Rose M Sattler; Ami P Modi; Ji-Hoon Lee; Matthew L Nicolette; Levy Kopelovich; Maria Jasin; Richard Baer; Tanya T Paull; Jean Gautier
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2008-01-06       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 7.  The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation.

Authors:  Felix Mitelman; Bertil Johansson; Fredrik Mertens
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Engineering variants of the I-SceI homing endonuclease with strand-specific and site-specific DNA-nicking activity.

Authors:  Yan Niu; Kristen Tenney; Hongye Li; Frederick S Gimble
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Naoya Uematsu; Eric Weterings; Ken-ichi Yano; Keiko Morotomi-Yano; Burkhard Jakob; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; Pierre-Olivier Mari; Dik C van Gent; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Michael J Kruhlak; Arkady Celeste; Graham Dellaire; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Waltraud G Müller; James G McNally; David P Bazett-Jones; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  122 in total

1.  Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Cheng-Sheng Lee; Ruoxi W Wang; Hsiao-Han Chang; Daniel Capurso; Mark R Segal; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Gagan D Gupta; Wei Zhang; Mikhail Bashkurov; Marie-Claude Landry; Laurence Pelletier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  High-Throughput Imaging for the Discovery of Cellular Mechanisms of Disease.

Authors:  Gianluca Pegoraro; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  53BP1-DNA repair enters a new liquid phase.

Authors:  Rossana Piccinno; Vera Minneker; Vassilis Roukos
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Frequency of DNA end joining in trans is not determined by the predamage spatial proximity of double-strand breaks in yeast.

Authors:  Sham Sunder; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Nanoscale invaginations of the nuclear envelope: Shedding new light on wormholes with elusive function.

Authors:  Ingmar Schoen; Lina Aires; Jonas Ries; Viola Vogel
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.197

7.  Peripheral subnuclear positioning suppresses Tcrb recombination and segregates Tcrb alleles from RAG2.

Authors:  Elizabeth A W Chan; Grace Teng; Elizabeth Corbett; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Craig H Bassing; David G Schatz; Michael S Krangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Remodelers move chromatin in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Andrew Seeber; Vincent Dion; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Unveiling Human Non-Random Genome Editing Mechanisms Activated in Response to Chronic Environmental Changes: I. Where Might These Mechanisms Come from and What Might They Have Led To?

Authors:  Loris Zamai
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 10.  A new class of protein cancer biomarker candidates: differentially expressed splice variants of ERBB2 (HER2/neu) and ERBB1 (EGFR) in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Gilbert S Omenn; Yuanfang Guan; Rajasree Menon
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.