Literature DB >> 31019070

Frequency of DNA end joining in trans is not determined by the predamage spatial proximity of double-strand breaks in yeast.

Sham Sunder1, Thomas E Wilson2,3.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are serious genomic insults that can lead to chromosomal rearrangements if repaired incorrectly. To gain insight into the nuclear mechanisms contributing to these rearrangements, we developed an assay in yeast to measure cis (same site) vs. trans (different site) repair for the majority process of precise nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). In the assay, the HO endonuclease gene is placed between two HO cut sites such that HO expression is self-terminated upon induction. We further placed an additional cut site in various genomic loci such that NHEJ in trans led to expression of a LEU2 reporter gene. Consistent with prior reports, cis NHEJ was more efficient than trans NHEJ. However, unlike homologous recombination, where spatial distance between a single DSB and donor locus was previously shown to correlate with repair efficiency, trans NHEJ frequency remained essentially constant regardless of the position of the two DSB loci, even when they were on the same chromosome or when two trans repair events were put in competition. Repair of similar DSBs via single-strand annealing of short terminal direct repeats showed substantially higher repair efficiency and trans repair frequency, but still without a strong correlation of trans repair to genomic position. Our results support a model in which yeast cells mobilize, and perhaps compartmentalize, multiple DSBs in a manner that no longer reflects the predamage position of two broken loci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genome rearrangement; homologous recombination; nonhomologous end joining; single-strand annealing; translocation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31019070      PMCID: PMC6510992          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818595116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  61 in total

1.  Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-deficient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplification subsequent to translocations.

Authors:  Chengming Zhu; Kevin D Mills; David O Ferguson; Charles Lee; John Manis; James Fleming; Yijie Gao; Cynthia C Morton; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells.

Authors:  Luis A Parada; Philip G McQueen; Peter J Munson; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Localization and dynamic relocalization of mammalian Rad52 during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Y Liu; M Li; E Y Lee; N Maizels
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-09-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Efficient processing of DNA ends during yeast nonhomologous end joining. Evidence for a DNA polymerase beta (Pol4)-dependent pathway.

Authors:  T E Wilson; M R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase.

Authors:  M Lisby; R Rothstein; U H Mortensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jeroen Essers; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Lieneke van Veelen; Coen Paulusma; Alex L Nigg; Albert Pastink; Wim Vermeulen; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  Detecting, signalling and repairing DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  S P Jackson
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.407

9.  Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae end-joining efficiency by cell growth stage but not by impairment of recombination.

Authors:  Elissa Karathanasis; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evidence for replicative repair of DNA double-strand breaks leading to oncogenic translocation and gene amplification.

Authors:  Michael J Difilippantonio; Simone Petersen; Hua Tang Chen; Roger Johnson; Maria Jasin; Roland Kanaar; Thomas Ried; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2002-08-19       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Double-strand breaks in motion: implications for chromosomal rearrangement.

Authors:  Thomas E Wilson; Sham Sunder
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  The Cyclically Seasonal Drosophila subobscura Inversion O7 Originated From Fragile Genomic Sites and Relocated Immunity and Metabolic Genes.

Authors:  Charikleia Karageorgiou; Rosa Tarrío; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Homology-directed repair involves multiple strand invasion cycles in fission yeast.

Authors:  Amanda J Vines; Kenneth Cox; Bryan A Leland; Megan C King
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Origin, Regulation, and Fitness Effect of Chromosomal Rearrangements in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xing-Xing Tang; Xue-Ping Wen; Lei Qi; Yang Sui; Ying-Xuan Zhu; Dao-Qiong Zheng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Mechanisms driving chromosomal translocations: lost in time and space.

Authors:  Dale A Ramsden; Andre Nussenzweig
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 9.867

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.